IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] On CONNECT-UDP Extensibility

Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> Tue, 29 March 2022 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <ianswett@google.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690883A1AD6 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 09:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vtf9pw0I-ZH for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 09:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C9B83A1AD4 for <masque@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 09:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id u3so25680250wrg.3 for <masque@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 09:34:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gf3NhVn7FUY9Db+Nr78OnZBql35NJTwH1gcaIBmZj/Q=; b=PpJ9haJZUl0YzCJCQPykdOOOTeZslzTeogmTI9hGIz/X28YWywghL07O8ujyX1UfHD E+g1EaT6c9q9+n9pYvyFvhCDIUQLmdP+dr7nlRJnjC5jkYf9U4c1Eu0gXEhXdMqCGa1G gwINrtW2UxJ0sL3j0fWlIpDbCgE4u0Ds7nDhlNKoS3Y09vAtFKH2y1xe4j+lMvDe04tY tjY1A4+7RrGzSCm2qEuRzw7UqAV3DjwGp72KkguwWEu6+alcO05To9+BMBMzodM5NlHF BpwsfIHGvhlyPZLjQeonVlkQm+Rqarom6l0POHWl0PPNBGBqlVG8bzXyUdy+fHubBMm7 QSVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gf3NhVn7FUY9Db+Nr78OnZBql35NJTwH1gcaIBmZj/Q=; b=413YmFxxx9sYoFmkum3mrs46qTiYxyxg0W3WustGMkx8iSZHYSANZSzQY9JGbsqq94 1kOhsp+8xI0PIfjbS+mFwxdTgLyXqY2iyK6ZulHv8HxHtJ8lct6BqBUhWNRXvKyjIwYU ii5qxRi3hqMtRWXHY84DsoJtOhXeamgdhZxb3xYDWh95gunePwxVIaJxIJiwPJzCvjmh GZBNt+DsdSFtFp7Zce42SwLwB6IbTW35PMseip3lwVm/DGFR9k8eELRVacn95Yz6/Ttl d1jr1Ax9KPo7A+5ewethFRCOW1tR/hpiOPqFCXXt9PYqKW5m+u+XLtrBcoebIOeAr8jq 2aXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HeFr8yPNVfzVtR5rMnhLbzUu64/gamCXgwgywnkSA4WM+0hSr zbylBClnidl6C60eTh5+xS/ad+Smvb1P/KoY3tR57W1OVN1lTQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznD3190dej/Ab3yqfZ6jcmLc78kCIPqi2mot6l5uF4gPgA/9uM0l3FcIEmOhrPMnuzJlsnzNLEP0ntqFe4psk=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:90:b0:205:ce69:cbe9 with SMTP id m16-20020a056000009000b00205ce69cbe9mr6777456wrx.260.1648571695117; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 09:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPDSy+5YE7K=YuecDb75eEiS7yYZquPcT41ihm+gWx=CBrWu7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+5YE7K=YuecDb75eEiS7yYZquPcT41ihm+gWx=CBrWu7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:34:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKcm_gOk3pforuQjjeE18CREbgvKxqxccOQgW7fcxG33MVWosw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: MASQUE <masque@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000046ed4f05db5e02e0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/lgjdyLeN-wgwbVuTmMKuyvXZePY>
Subject: Re: [Masque] On CONNECT-UDP Extensibility
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:35:01 -0000

This looks sensible to me, though I'd suggest: "When indicating support for
this extension, the proxy send the client's chosen context ID as the "ECN"
field value." to "To indicate support for this extension, the proxy MUST
send the client's chosen context ID as the "ECN" field value."

Just to clarify that the IDs need to match for the negotiation to complete.

Ian

On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 6:04 PM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi MASQUE Enthusiasts,
>
> Last week at the IETF 113 MASQUE session, we discussed starting the WGLC
> for CONNECT-UDP. As part of that discussion, the sense of the room was that
> it was OK to progress CONNECT-UDP without having it define all possible
> registration mechanisms, and Ted proposed that we write up an example of
> the simple header-based registration mechanism as a separate draft. Mirja
> proposed using the ECN extension for that, so I spent some time revising
> that draft to have it fit this purpose. That revised draft is now available
> at:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-schinazi-masque-connect-udp-ecn-02.html
>
> Thanks,
> David
> --
> Masque mailing list
> Masque@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email