[Masque] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on charter-ietf-masque-02-01: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-masque-02-01: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-masque/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Proxying Ethernet frames over MASQUE is a good idea, and I am supportive.
Please consider the following comments as a way to improve the project.

1) why limiting to Ethernet only ? Why not trying to be more generic (at least
802.11 frames but also any layer-2 PDU) ? Possibly with other I-Ds

2) beyond coordination with IEEE (or other layer-2 SDO), should intarea WG also
be consulted (as it covers sub-IP layers) ?

About draft-ietf-masque-connect-ethernet, I am really surprised to see that
this I-D has been adopted in contradiction to the current charter. I would also
suggest that the document borrows from L2TPv3 and others rather than only from
connect-udp as layer-2 is a different beast.

Hope this helps this good idea