Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-maccnt-req resubmit
Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 03 October 2010 23:02 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB923A6EBE for <mboned@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 16:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.503
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.503 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l83rtL0sqWPF for <mboned@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 16:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C583A6D87 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 16:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTKkLyECMGWrmzm4VffxzHIzVx/ffNXie@postini.com; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:03:36 PDT
Received: from p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.25) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 16:02:33 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe02-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::c126:c633:d2dc:8090%11]) with mapi; Sun, 3 Oct 2010 19:02:32 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 19:02:31 -0400
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-mboned-maccnt-req resubmit
Thread-Index: Actgx4Klae455jOxSo6StEKYVBZimgChs9fQ
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B0201C1F5A@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <20100930104311.W35733@zircon.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100930104311.W35733@zircon.juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-maccnt-req resubmit
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 23:02:43 -0000
Folks,
The WG chairs tell me that draft-ietf-mboned-maccnt-req has been significantly revised and has passed WG last call. However, in my opinion, the WG last call was too quiet. I would like to ask the following questions of as many WG participants as I can get to respond:
1) Have you read the draft since it was revised?
2) Do you believe that the work falls within the WG charter? Please substantiate.
3) If these requirements were published, do you think that there is sufficient interest within the community to follow up?
Ron
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-maccnt-req resubmit Ronald Bonica
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-maccnt-req resubmit Kinugasa Manabu