IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] call for adoption of draft-acg-mboned-multicast-models

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Thu, 21 December 2017 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618BC1201F2 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:01:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DyIbFpxL5LCw for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:01:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185251205F0 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id q14so20093308qke.7 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:01:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=venaas-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rBK+/W8iKlNpSLB5k02OOrwaSZJQVte0BqtemNRjzQ4=; b=VXODgKv2ADtpc07ueM+92kdjkQMwHps9VVblVAC54B9MVnzwWXMOwV0KhK6o2EM09Z iKrcBe8iof/jfW+N1pp9taPlcGGxTrO/LFIyYOAZveVgTB5FEySr1jwC8kuFNNlJZ3Bq briX6mfBdRUCLlKBrkZpD5vxnS3/zkSRg1wkfzUelaGSTh9hybXMitHI8VZxNQmtbW1p H3DjT9Hg7gEYNUUe2Rkr7S0eiE7ETzEsbbQ9me0kQc5ntZ7IlbAXHmtkNAG0F2Lpv/pq 2qQznBoN08Z14MWWxNp1dzV+CRtwfqnFbssY/cGzax3sZhIgvyApHoephioaqCn5CFyP adiA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rBK+/W8iKlNpSLB5k02OOrwaSZJQVte0BqtemNRjzQ4=; b=bFLPKj6D3oYDgNanZr1HBbmwkoGoLa53K697SeAwtCUAP93izHpz5G8WFjx5t3O//l aPDp3hZP20/vsTWn4xP4Pi8wmeaioLmtcKjmx0lyXSGwfbVjk5GVvx6qTaxfPR8SDlQC N4NL2xOvQKy0sFj3lZgU5KSBf1AXxQaWS35X2A9BkRKlb1q8j10jpy2Ps7WNUJKOhGcv ziRba5rxqa7XM+0FYtT8AXxSQyJudDmkK4m7mwfdL3aHmfaa/dqZtI9HTn3KvybaRZ/y WMyg0hzREZQyNtfWq8MtokEh+GAVdVUkoXlGCORe/fg3Lw9RgzBINHZPXfuRBdHSjVSa +SJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJv0Tua1SajtAnXnZf4fIDNjzqMjOfR4sIb5TVCRjiNfjlaKl5I xEq5wmLiKYOjAx2xYpVtEcvBRev5jm9OErl/7/hM8kjX
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotCccfb3JaHudFXaw2iIcU8A8Nid9vZMb31UOFfLdyM83BgT0Rxz5JIWrZMMkxDos15XPuH6kpOggmuYyS4c5Y=
X-Received: by 10.55.137.135 with SMTP id l129mr15944162qkd.294.1513897261070; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:01:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.20.81 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:01:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <60D9F8C2-DD51-41A3-83AF-FB760A17AA62@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1712041144230.20715@svl-jtac-lnx02.juniper.net> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1712140839590.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <B3E11537-EB47-488D-ACC5-1FDFFF56DEE1@jisc.ac.uk> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1712140739440.3608@svl-jtac-lnx02.juniper.net> <60D9F8C2-DD51-41A3-83AF-FB760A17AA62@jisc.ac.uk>
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:01:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHANBtJZoFVeJiDvca1G34bo8Uy8RDdwNyFfxF5RvM2M9ThteA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
Cc: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>, MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/4bYVICXhmUEmCupYVrpTFwxWg1o>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] call for adoption of draft-acg-mboned-multicast-models
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:01:04 -0000

Hi

I probably support adoption... However, I don't like the title of the
document. I don't mind the deprecation, but the document has a lot of
text explaining different models and guidance. It's much more than
just that deprecation. I prefer the version 00 title.

I would like to know, is the main goal deprecation, as in the title,
or to provide information and guidance about service models? I would
potentially like to see two documents. One with the original title and
scope, and a second document focusing on the deprecation and why.

Stig


On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> wrote:
>> On 14 Dec 2017, at 15:45, Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net> wrote:
>>
>> Likewise, as a coauthor, I am not aware of any IPR.  And I would love to
>> see it pruned to focus on the interdomain ASM deprecation/strong SSM
>> recommendation.  And some softening of the intradomain verbiage also seems
>> reasonable.
>
> I’d agree with that.
>
> Tim
>
>>
>> -Lenny
>>
>> On Thu, 14 Dec 2017, Tim Chown wrote:
>>
>> | >> Please respond by Dec 18 if you do/do not support adoption of this draft.
>> |
>> | >
>> |
>> | > As co-author, I support adoption of this draft.
>> |
>> | Likewise, though it’s not clear from the very brief IETF 100 minutes
>> | whether the draft retains its current structure or is pruned down to
>> | focus on the SSM recommendation and inter-domain ASM deprecation.  What
>> | was the outcome of that discussion?
>> |
>> | >> If you are listed as a document author, please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. If you are not listed as an author and are aware of any relevant IPR, please respond as well.
>> |
>> | > I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> | Likewise.
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> | Tim
>> |
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email