[MBONED] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-14: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 31 October 2017 08:34 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC4F13F6B9; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 01:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp@ietf.org, mboned-chairs@ietf.org, tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk, mboned@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150943886479.28384.8698296324769434500.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 01:34:24 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/IyJkEBy4uKd9tfxAP8DoFwvy6dg>
Subject: [MBONED] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2017 08:34:25 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my discuss and providing a detailed section on congestion control. And thanks Yoshi for the TSV-ART review again! ----------------------------- Old questions/comments: 1) Section 3.4 also says: "Highly efficient use of bandwidth in AD-1." But aren't packets eventually duplicated in this case in AD-1? I guess it's more efficient than replicating them at the network border but might be still less efficient than native multicast in the whole network, no? 2) section 4.3.3 says: "The two AD's may supply additional security logs..." This seems to be a general action not specific to multicast or the scenarios described in this doc. 3) I don't think the conclusion section (8) is helpful or needed. If you want to keep it at all, this text could be moved into the introduction.
- [MBONED] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kühlewind