IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] Progressing the AMT draft

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Mon, 14 December 2009 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FE63A67F5 for <mboned@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:40:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sgBqQcKaOrUF for <mboned@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEC63A63EC for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:40:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:420:1:fff:0:5efe:10.32.214.37] (unknown [IPv6:2001:420:1:fff:0:5efe:a20:d625]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68ADE33B5C; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:40:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B26CCEA.4060609@venaas.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 15:40:26 -0800
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mboned@ietf.org
References: <26204459-1DB0-41DD-96AD-3102E558D6FB@bangj.com> <38c19b540911251930l58008090h4960760d75adbfc8@mail.gmail.com> <578694E9-71FF-4C3D-9FE8-F62A4FD83C4D@bangj.com> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0911260844300.30140@netcore.fi> <DDB4A1D6-09B2-407E-B837-9824C5A027CD@cisco.com> <20091204124629.G14314@zircon.juniper.net> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0912091043160.15729@netcore.fi> <20091210141033.G4294@zircon.juniper.net> <alpine.LRH.2.00.0912110903290.29406@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0912110903290.29406@netcore.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gjshep@gmail.com, Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Progressing the AMT draft
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:40:51 -0000

Pekka Savola wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2009, Leonard Giuliano wrote:
>> b) Change the current AMT draft to require the UDP checksum to be
>> calculated and submit it to the IESG. Get their feedback on other changes
>> that need to be made in order to proceed the draft to a proposed 
>> standard.
>> Make all the necessary changes needed and go back and forth with the IESG
>> getting the draft exactly like it needs to be.  If by then, the checksum
>> issue is worked out, we can make the change to the draft. If not, we can
>> decide at that time how to proceed.
> 
> If it wasn't already obvious, I support b).  I'm also OK with Dave 
> Thaler's suggested c) as long as writing the other document doesn't 
> delay this one.

I support b too. It's been held up far too long,

Stig

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email