IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] recharter text

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Fri, 24 August 2012 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8E121F8576 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyAfgdKTDWzw for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD1C21F8554 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:420:301:1004:2813:da6:1dff:7b0f] (unknown [IPv6:2001:420:301:1004:2813:da6:1dff:7b0f]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 635557FEF; Sat, 25 Aug 2012 00:40:24 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <503802D6.5040409@venaas.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:40:22 -0700
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
References: <mailman.584.1343157655.3364.mboned@ietf.org> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D770C81AE2@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <50103032.9060900@venaas.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D770C8209C@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D770C8209C@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] recharter text
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:40:26 -0000

On 7/25/2012 11:35 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
>
>>
>> - Analyze the need for IPv4 - IPv6 multicast transition solutions
>>
>
> Stig,
>
> I would be happy with this text, but nothing more. AFAIKS, an thorough analysis of the need for IPv4 - IPv6 multicast transition solutions may reveal that:
>
> - there is an need to solve the IPvX-DualStack-IPvY use cases
> - all other use cases are best addressed by caching content on strategically located, dual-stack devices or, even better, by deploying dual stack
>
> If we were to put anything about MLTRANS solutions into the document, we might be committing to do work that will never see deployment.

Sure. Sorry for the late reply. I think we're in agreement then. I'm
just saying that we should at least have text describing the work the
WG already has taken on (the two adopted drafts). I think adding that
one sentence should be sufficient.

We don't know yet whether the WG should do more work...

Stig

>                                                       Ron
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email