IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] An alternative to draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format?

Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Mon, 02 July 2012 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A90B21F854F for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0qX-ExiYZE22 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A2C21F854E for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach.fuaim.com [206.197.161.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A53880CF for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clemson.local (c-68-33-164-105.hsd1.dc.comcast.net [68.33.164.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AFB130017 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 15:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FF21A32.7030304@innovationslab.net>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:01:22 -0400
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mboned@ietf.org
References: <4FECD32D.30403@venaas.com> <EE15DDE8-F921-4F9F-B0B4-704A8BD10045@huawei.com> <4FECD960.8070407@venaas.com> <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BC4A5ADC@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com> <4FECDBA0.3090405@venaas.com> <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BC4A5AE1@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com> <4FED2926.60300@venaas.com> <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BC4A5D35@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com> <4FEE1EDF.7010907@venaas.com> <4FEF2DB9.2030809@gmail.com> <CAC8QAccGDUJx7DbFS8Bwgr4+4jF6FVE2=t7zAQfGkzy=3-vaZg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAccGDUJx7DbFS8Bwgr4+4jF6FVE2=t7zAQfGkzy=3-vaZg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [MBONED] An alternative to draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format?
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 22:01:20 -0000

On 7/2/12 4:17 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Tom Taylor <tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> It would be good to preserve the advantages of embedded RP. You certainly
>> can't have a well-known /96 and use embedded RP.
>
>
> Why not?
>
> If the translator is able to use an IPv6 Embedded-
> RP prefix to represent IPv4 ASM groups on the IPv6 network, no
> modifications are required
> to the configuration of other PIM routers.

This would not be a well-known 96-bit prefix.  The information 
describing the RP address (within that /96) would change based on which 
network is maintaining the RP.

Regards,
Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email