Re: [MBONED] WGLCs for draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery

I support advancing draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems
and draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery.

I found draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems useful; I had a suggestion
for clarity:
Sec 3.2.4:
>> "This means that routers very often receive packets destined for IP
addresses regardless of whether they are in use."
The sentence was a bit confusing on first read; mainly what "they" refers
to. If my understanding is correct, "they" refers to the addresses the
packets are destined for?

DRIAD as described in draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery definitely
seems very useful to help drive adoption of AMT; I have no suggestions here.

Regards,
William

On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:02 PM Holland, Jake <jholland@akamai.com> wrote:

> I support advancing ieee802-mcast-problems, in case I haven't
> expressed that (I can't find it in my sent emails, so I'm embarrassed
> to notice that maybe I didn't, after the last round incorporating my
> review comments.)
>
> I've volunteered as shepherd for this doc, and now that I've skimmed
> through some of the resources[1-3] about that, it seems I should be
> doing the write-up now.
>
> Cheers,
> Jake
>
> [1] file:///Users/jholland/Downloads/rtgwg_train_8.pdf
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4858
> [3] https://www6.ietf.org/iesg/statement/document-shepherds.html
>
> On 2019-06-04, 13:45, "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>
>     As an author on one of these documents:
>
>     Dear WG,
>
>     You expressed interest in these documents, and we've had (IMO) some
>     good discussions on them at meetings
>     (draft-perkins-intarea-multicast-ieee802 merged into
>     draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problem) -- I think that the document
>     are an easy read, and serve a useful purpose.
>
>     Please take some time to read, and post comments to the list -- as
>     someone who often has to deal with WiFi issues caused from excessive
>     broadcast / multicast, I'd really appreciate this topic getting more
>     review and wider attention.
>
>     W
>
>
>
>
>     On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 10:43 AM Leonard Giuliano
>     <lenny=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > WGLCs have completed for both
> draft-ietf-mboned-ieee802-mcast-problems and
>     > draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery, and to date, we've only
> received
>     > support on the list for advancing these docs from two and five
>     > non-authors, respectively.  This is not enough to determine
> consensus for
>     > advancing either doc.
>     >
>     > That said, both docs have enjoyed tremendous support from folks in
> the
>     > meetings/list in the past and there has been no particularly
> controversies
>     > noted in either doc.  As such, we've decided to extend the WGLC for
> the
>     > next 10 days give a little extra time to hear from folks.
>     >
>     > Please reply to this if you do/do not support advancing
>     > either/both/neither doc by Jun 13.  And further comments on either
> doc
>     > would be welcome.
>     >
>     >
>     > -Chairs
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > MBONED mailing list
>     > MBONED@ietf.org
>     > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>
>
>
>     --
>     I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>     idea in the first place.
>     This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>     regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>     of pants.
>        ---maf
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     MBONED mailing list
>     MBONED@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>

-- 
William Zhang
TJHSST '18 | UVA SEAS '22
https://wzhang.me