Re: [MBONED] [Mops] [pim] WGLC started for TreeDN

[Andrew Gallo <[e-mail]>]

Greetings, Friends:

I've been helping out with the testing of some of the components of this 
proposal- we host an AMT relay and some content and we've done a lot of 
testing of different scenarios and software.

I support the advancement of the draft- I'd love to see others start to 
work with the technology and improve it.

Thank you




On 12/5/2023 10:57 AM, Bernier, Daniel wrote:
> Same here
>
>
> TreeDN should be part of the toolset.
>
>
> Regards
>
>
> Daniel Bernier
> Technology Strategy & Architecture | Bell Canada
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Mops <[e-mail]> on behalf of Max Franke <mfranke=[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 9:22 AM
> To: Dino Farinacci; Michael McBride
> Cc: Leslie Daigle; Chris Lemmons; MOPS Working Group; [e-mail]; Deen, Glenn; MBONED WG; [e-mail]
> Subject: [EXT]Re: [Mops] [MBONED] [pim] WGLC started for TreeDN
>
> I also support advancement of this draft. TreeDN provides useful
> usecases and also by now has quite a bit of deployment/ implementation
> reports that show its usefulness.
>
> Best,
>
> Max
>
> On 04.12.23 21:40, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>> I too support the advancement of this draft. It provides another (read: practical) mechanism to preserve the multicast service model for Internet wide deployments.
>>
>> Dino
>>
>>> On Dec 4, 2023, at 12:35 PM, Michael McBride <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I support advancement of this draft.  My only suggestion would be to soften “Further rationale for this SSM-only approach can be found in ASM Deprecation [RFC8815].” The multicast community understands this as “recommended ASM deprecation” but others may not. ASM hasn’t been deprecated.
>>>    thanks,
>>> mike
>>>     From: pim <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Kyle Rose
>>> Sent: Monday, December 4, 2023 6:16 AM
>>> To: MOPS Working Group <[e-mail]>; MBONED WG <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
>>> Cc: Leslie Daigle <[e-mail]>; Deen, Glenn <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Chris Lemmons <[e-mail]>
>>> Subject: Re: [pim] WGLC started for TreeDN
>>>    4 days later, I spontaneously realized I forgot to do what Lenny suggested: inclulding mboned and PIM on the WGLC notification. This email is rectifying that mistake!
>>>    As discussed in the MOPS session at IETF 118, the chairs have initiated working group last call for TreeDN. This WGLC will last for two weeks (which at this point means it ends on Thursday, December 14th). Please review and send any comments or suggestions to the MOPS mailing list. Lenny suggested including mboned and PIM on this WGLC to catch some more folks with multicast subject matter expertise.
>>>    Thanks,
>>> Kyle
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MBONED mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>> _______________________________________________
>> MBONED mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> --
> Mops mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mops
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> External Email: Please use caution when opening links and attachments / Courriel externe: Soyez prudent avec les liens et documents joints
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned