[MBONED]Gorry Fairhurst's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-07: (with COMMENT)

[Gorry Fairhurst via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Gorry Fairhurst has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work done in this document, I enjoted reading this. I have
reviwed previous AMT documents, but do not see specific transport topics in
this document. There were, however,  a few places where terminolog is defined,
but could be more consistently applied.

NiTs:
/a AMT Relay/ perhaps ought to be /an AMT Relay/
/AMT relay/AMT Relay/ - in various places, since "Relay" is already capitalised
without AMT? /AMT gateway/AMT Gateway/ - for consistency in text and the
comments? /Support of relay or gateway is indicated/Support of an AMT Relay or
an AMT Gateway is indicated/ /relay discovery message/Relay Discovery message/
- as per RFC7450. /relay discovery address/Relay Discovery Address/ - as per
RFC7450. /relay address/Relay Address/ - as per RFC7450.

Regards,

Gorry