Re: [MBONED] MBoned: Re: WG Review: L3VPN Service Model (l3sm)
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 06 March 2015 18:27 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445D51A1B87; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:27:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OR3PG--8OxHp; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D371A1B72; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 516E5C249; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 13:27:49 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 13:27:49 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20150306182749.GF9388@pfrc>
References: <20150306165456.GT16454@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150306165456.GT16454@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/ytX8L0SRCX54R5pHECj23HrQYGA>
Cc: mboned@ietf.org, pim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MBONED] MBoned: Re: WG Review: L3VPN Service Model (l3sm)
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 18:27:50 -0000
[note I am only subscribed to mboned and may have missed related comments elsewhere.] Toerless, On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0800, Toerless Eckert wrote: > Any thoughts on this ? Anybody from mboned planning to contribute to > this work to ensure that L3VPN multicast would be represented in the > data model created ? FWIW, I'd ask Benoit for clarification on what he's including in l3vpn. It may be possible that he's targeting *unicast* l3vpn only and had not considered multicast l3vpn. I've copied Benoit for that clarification. For my part, I consider the two problems to be of completely different levels of service complexity and while we probably want to try to leverage similar components in the service models as possible, they may not have many. -- Jeff
- Re: [MBONED] MBoned: Re: WG Review: L3VPN Service… Benoit Claise
- [MBONED] MBoned: Re: WG Review: L3VPN Service Mod… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [MBONED] MBoned: Re: WG Review: L3VPN Service… Jeffrey Haas