Re: [mdnsext] mdnsext & SLP

Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com> Fri, 21 June 2013 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <msweet@apple.com>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DC521F9BF4 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.931
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.931 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s0-lkrdPVshr for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out.apple.com (mail-out.apple.com [17.151.62.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA0C21F9AF1 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_US15KYs4UyBBuQ0ZuU8YlA)"
Received: from relay4.apple.com ([17.128.113.87]) by mail-out.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MOR007TE1IYOLL0@mail-out.apple.com> for mdnsext@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 11807157-b7f706d0000006c6-56-51c4709e6ea4
Received: from [17.153.35.213] (Unknown_Domain [17.153.35.213]) (using TLS with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by relay4.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id C9.F2.01734.0A074C15; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 08:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
In-reply-to: <CABbPf3gpc_BFK5aFHVQHRwKnYwXVGXnFQKrvHbj-=_b_KbAxQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:26:22 -0400
Message-id: <BCBFAA10-634B-4479-A653-25655236801E@apple.com>
References: <CABbPf3gpc_BFK5aFHVQHRwKnYwXVGXnFQKrvHbj-=_b_KbAxQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Garret Peirce <peirce@maine.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1764)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUiOFP5qu7CgiOBBg1npC1OLjnFZHHkW6zF rgMTGB2YPbae/MHmsWTJTyaP079amQOYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyzk9pYC9YIV9xb34XYwNj v3QXIyeHhICJxLylU9ghbDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICfQySRxb3cIIkhAWUJHYN3cDWBGvgJ7EtoUH wGxmgQSJvp6rYDVsAmoSvyf1sYLYnAKBEvcv/2EDsVkEVCWmHL3DClGvLLFi2g0miDk2El+m 7WLuYuQAWhYgcfIgF4gpArRqx8FCiHNkJSb2XWOcwMg3C8niWUgWQ9jaEssWvmaGsPUkXja9 Y8cU15W4uG4S4wJGtlWMAkWpOYmVJnqJBQU5qXrJ+bmbGEEh21AYvoPx3zKrQ4wCHIxKPLwH Uo8ECrEmlhVX5h5ilOBgVhLhZQ8CCvGmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2KU5mBREufd+OpgoJBAemJJ anZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoFxt/H24pj4neue3lgV3/bzhRN35zPl26umXdbsnTC5kHvWgWqxtQfv fFztFLQzIPPHtmItLnm/ZwdtRf81eh/+eFNxXvvc1vA/ZwP/9L6b4ie0efaTjk4necN+W+FD Nq/1l/DU/TDeN/nuFn+FuT4NC/I0guaptLl/NdNLVBc0PTw3/ohD35bFSizFGYmGWsxFxYkA tOUSvFUCAAA=
Cc: IETF mdnsext <mdnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] mdnsext & SLP
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:26:39 -0000

Garret,

On Jun 21, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Garret Peirce <peirce@maine.edu> wrote:
> I'm curious why SLP is not a potential solution to the hurdle of 'service discovery beyond the local link'.

Speaking from experience, SLP is painful without a DA, and you need an accessible DA on every network segment.

> Ignoring client support for the moment, SLP seems like an existing, defined mechanism for scalable SD.

AFAIK, SLP does not solve the multiple-network problem.

> It seems this draft aims to develop an alternate method to do so.

Well, I think the goal is to come up with a solution to the multiple-network problem that scales while retaining dynamic registration/advertising of services.  The focus may be on mDNS and DNS-SD (because that drove the petition to fix things...) but I suspect that solutions for DNS-SD and mDNS would also work for extending SLP.

_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair