[media-types] [WG] Confirmation of deciions at IETF 113
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 29 March 2022 14:07 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521193A0E3E for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:07:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86tHJpMy6pNY for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.alvestrand.no (smtp.alvestrand.no [65.21.189.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781D13A0E74 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.3.157] (unknown [78.156.11.215]) by smtp.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB4D43FC62 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:07:26 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3189e172-9b13-2b16-f086-afb26b81a14b@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:07:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.2
Content-Language: en-US
To: "media-types@ietf.org" <media-types@ietf.org>
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/NxY1ZUlih-Z1qvPopkWO4cgNd1Y>
Subject: [media-types] [WG] Confirmation of deciions at IETF 113
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:07:32 -0000
The people who met in person and virtually at IETF 113 for MEDIAMAN had consensus on the following decisions: - Adopt draft-duerst-mediaman-toplevel as a WG document - Make "standards track RFC" a requirement for registering a new top level media type (as it is today) If you wish to raise an objection to either of these two decisions, please do so within a week (April 5, 2022); if no objection is heard, we will regard these decisions as IETF WG consensus decisions. If someone objects, we will try to figure out if we have rough consensus or not. From the sense of the room in Vienna, there seemed o be little controversy on these points. Harald, as WG chair
- [media-types] [WG] Confirmation of deciions at IE… Harald Alvestrand