Re: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (NO) on draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics
Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sun, 23 July 2023 17:23 UTC
Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4029C14CEFE for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.887
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.887 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xmrn8Wqb34m1 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.alvestrand.no (smtp.alvestrand.no [65.21.189.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3F9DC14F73E for <media-types@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:23:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.130.172] (dhcp-82ac.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.130.172]) by smtp.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7CCA4CDF5; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 19:23:47 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8B1Vf1ubvylD9ssFwTQ7agLf"
Message-ID: <be2a4cfa-e078-a1bc-901f-fa0c7d4a144f@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 10:23:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Yeshwant Muthusamy <ymuthusamy@immersion.com>, "media-types@ietf.org" <media-types@ietf.org>
Cc: "yeshwant@yeshvik.com" <yeshwant@yeshvik.com>
References: <777643ac-4960-264a-7dd0-4e9e731b7626@alvestrand.no> <SN4PR16MB4879B982D449335AA3659675DE38A@SN4PR16MB4879.namprd16.prod.outlook.com> <f878c99a-39ce-39b2-aa4e-fd4306805b93@alvestrand.no> <SN4PR16MB487938946FAA4FC6C6C44587DE3FA@SN4PR16MB4879.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
In-Reply-To: <SN4PR16MB487938946FAA4FC6C6C44587DE3FA@SN4PR16MB4879.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/gnAr7T6IxfrrR-ygmdsxgUNHLfw>
Subject: Re: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (NO) on draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 17:23:56 -0000
On 7/21/23 20:45, Yeshwant Muthusamy wrote: > > Hi Harald, > > Regarding your comment: > > >>- Section 4 does not ask IANA to register "haptics" in the top level > registry (this is a side effect of referencing 6838). > > It is not clear to me what my action here is; clearly I am missing > something. Please bear with me. > > This is what "Section 4. IANA Considerations" currently says: > > This specification registers a new top-level type, 'haptics', in the > > standards tree, adds it as an alternative value of "Type Name" in the > > media types registration form [Media-Type-Registration], and > > registers several subtypes for it. > > What changes, if any, do I need to make to this prose? Or, were you > suggesting that I add prose elsewhere in Section 4? > New prose: This specification registers a new top level type, "haptics", and requests IANA to add it to the registry of top level types specified in [toplevel], adds it .... (Top level types are not subject to the standards tree / vendor tree distinction, so "in the standards tree" is not applicable.) > Please clarify. > > Thanks, > > Yeshwant > > Yeshwant Muthusamy, Ph.D. | Consulting CTO > > ymuthusamy@immersion.com | +1 469-583-2171 > > www.immersion.com > > 2999 N. E. 191st Street, Suite 610 > > Aventura, FL 33180 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 4:58 PM > To: Yeshwant Muthusamy <ymuthusamy@immersion.com>; media-types@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (NO) on > draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics > > On 7/18/23 18:33, Yeshwant Muthusamy wrote: > > > Hi Harald, > > > > > > Thanks for the valuable feedback. > > > > > > Regarding IVS, the specification has been divulged to MPEG and is > effectively part of the ISO/IEC 23090-31 Haptic Coding standard (that > is currently in DIS ballot and is expected to progress to FDIS - Final > Draft International Standard at the October 2023 MPEG meeting). So > making ISO the change controller for IVS is not an issue. Can make > that change in v04 of the haptics I-D. > > > > > > Regarding HAPT, the specification has not been published anywhere > and even if it were, having a vendor specification in a Standards > Track RFC seems strange. Therefore, I would like to replace HAPT with > either or both HMPG and HJIF - which are two haptic subtypes that are > part of ISO/IEC 23090-31 DIS standard referenced above. HMPG is a > binary streaming haptic format and HJIF is a JSON human-readable > equivalent of HMPG. When the haptics I-D draft was first published, > these two subtypes were nothing more than a glint in my eye, hence > could not include them. Now they are more mature and fleshed out and > about to be part of an ISO standard, hence the change. Would this > change satisfy your concern? I ask before taking the time to add these > two subtype registrations to v04. The change controller for these new > subtypes will be ISO. > > Yes, that will satisfy my concern. > > > > > > Regarding referencing the TOPLEVEL procedure (that is currently > under discussion in MEDIAMAN), what would the actual reference prose > look like? Do I need to wait until it gets approved and gets a new RFC > number, or do I just reference the latest toplevel I-D? > > Just reference the toplevel I-D where you would otherwise use the RFC > number. The RFC Editor will take care of replacing it. Remember to > list it under normative references - if your doc reaches the RFC > Editor before the -toplevel doc, the RFC Editor will hold it until the > RFC number is available, and then substitute. > > > > > > I am fine with making the other non-substantive changes that you > have raised. > > > > > > Would appreciate responses to my questions above at your earliest > convenience so that I can get v04 ready in time for IETF 117. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Yeshwant > > > > > > Yeshwant Muthusamy, Ph.D. | Consulting CTO ymuthusamy@immersion.com > <mailto:ymuthusamy@immersion.com> | > > > +1 469-583-2171 > > > > > > > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flink > <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flink> > > > protect.cudasvc.com%2Furl%3Fa%3Dhttp%253a%252f%252fwww.immersion.com%2 > > > 52f%26c%3DE%2C1%2CpBB4OqudvUJxQh1i2yMofC426_dEm1JBMkH-lLXwxovpMpRV-2DQ > > > g3ms4g8a0u41ECN3MVd0xWw_HaFaTfrJOei6fc8pw2GKaKzNpLZKRPSBngvK%26typo%3D > > > 1&data=05%7C01%7C%7Ccb3ed89b7215448efc4008db87da1a1f%7C4f05e41a59b8413 > > > aae19d5df3dfd0fb5%7C0%7C0%7C638253143094940215%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d > > > 8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C > > > 3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zb20%2Fg2BIb2OBKJiAQqSqjcwcyzeHIVFCM1NePYQ4Z0%3D&r > > > eserved=0 > > > 2999 N. E. 191st Street, Suite 610 > > > Aventura, FL 33180 > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: media-types <media-types-bounces@ietf.org > <mailto:media-types-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Harald > > > Alvestrand > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 8:58 AM > > > To: media-types@ietf.org <mailto:media-types@ietf.org> > > > Subject: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (NO) on > > > draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics > > > > > > Apologies for the lateness of this response. > > > > > > I have read draft-ietf-mediaman-haptics -03, and I think it is NOT > ready for publication as an RFC (or IETF Last Call). > > > > > > Two substantive issues: > > > > > > > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith> > > > ub.com%2Fietf-wg-mediaman%2Fhaptics%2Fissues%2F4&data=05%7C01%7C%7Ccb3 > > > ed89b7215448efc4008db87da1a1f%7C4f05e41a59b8413aae19d5df3dfd0fb5%7C0%7 > > > C0%7C638253143094940215%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC > > > JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qkQ > > > J%2FzG79J%2BbNNoQ4hz7L6xlqUQsq5qXyc1gjR839UM%3D&reserved=0 - HAPT type > > > definition needs more work (specification, name and change controller) > > > > > > > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith> > > > ub.com%2Fietf-wg-mediaman%2Fhaptics%2Fissues%2F3&data=05%7C01%7C%7Ccb3 > > > ed89b7215448efc4008db87da1a1f%7C4f05e41a59b8413aae19d5df3dfd0fb5%7C0%7 > > > C0%7C638253143094940215%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLC > > > JQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=C3L > > > uzg56%2B9h75Z4NmQKHinZVwZdv1qgyu%2FqyqvQ4UaI%3D&reserved=0 - IVS type > > > definition needs more work (specification and change controller) > > > > > > Once these are cleared up, I think the document is ready. > > > > > > Non-substantive issues that should also be cleared up while > addressing the above: > > > > > > - Section 1 claims to register the subtype according to RFC 6838; it > > > should be referencing [TOPLEVEL] > > > > (https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit > <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit> > > > hub.com%2Fietf-wg-mediaman%2Fhaptics%2Fissues%2F5&data=05%7C01%7C%7Ccb > > > 3ed89b7215448efc4008db87da1a1f%7C4f05e41a59b8413aae19d5df3dfd0fb5%7C0% > > > 7C0%7C638253143094940215%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiL > > > CJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=eR > > > PtIrQ1cDRyPGG4EB9gRh8u%2BbyVFAg10A%2FP9Qf1iZU%3D&reserved=0) > > > - In section 3, the sentence starting "Ultimately, any coded > representation..." adds no value and should be deleted. > > > - Section 4 does not ask IANA to register "haptics" in the top level > registry (this is a side effect of referencing 6838). > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > media-types mailing list > > > media-types@ietf.org <mailto:media-types@ietf.org> > > > > https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flink > <https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flink> > > > protect.cudasvc.com%2Furl%3Fa%3Dhttps%253a%252f%252fwww.ietf.org%252fm > > > ailman%252flistinfo%252fmedia-types%26c%3DE%2C1%2CLN4qkZGWCsxkGqz1WSxo > > > bdWAwHNM65qPbAo0be74UPgooX7C6mHsndFw0nGvNWk3V1U1u5UWgj9kt5OQzBl0PmHfpb > > > jEXob8sqCdM0Vb_Wv_MD_nX7Wus2Yex_Y%2C%26typo%3D1&data=05%7C01%7C%7Ccb3e > > > d89b7215448efc4008db87da1a1f%7C4f05e41a59b8413aae19d5df3dfd0fb5%7C0%7C > > > 0%7C638253143094940215%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJ > > > QIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YvsP > > > pKNnaqs%2B7HZh1FPcTcDge8TGfUSsBJ1JAbG0nTw%3D&reserved=0 >
- [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (NO) … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (… Yeshwant Muthusamy
- Re: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (… Yeshwant Muthusamy
- Re: [media-types] [MEDIAMAN] Last Call response (… Harald Alvestrand