Re: [media-types] [Ext] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-mediaman-toplevel-03: (with COMMENT)

[Amanda Baber <[e-mail]>]

IANA also prefers that the registration procedure be repeated in the IANA Considerations section. Also, the RFC 8126 term "Standards Action" should be used.

Thanks,
Amanda

On 9/20/23, 2:01 AM, "iesg on behalf of Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker" <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

    Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-mediaman-toplevel-03: No Objection

    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)


    Please refer to https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/__;!!PtGJab4!9_juBFGzoFD7ttUitU-KIzteMTFlnXdpQy43IewVscJISi9kaKYHatT31NRsb8iSXpcEJ0jjY0dpU7Fb3z94NVM$ [ietf[.]org] 
    for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mediaman-toplevel/__;!!PtGJab4!9_juBFGzoFD7ttUitU-KIzteMTFlnXdpQy43IewVscJISi9kaKYHatT31NRsb8iSXpcEJ0jjY0dpU7FbM4P3ltM$ [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org]



    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thanks for working on this specification. I think the additional considerations
    will be useful.

    In my review I have no TSV related issues (obviously :-) ). However, I think
    the IANA consideration section should say the registry policy is "RFC required"
    with "standard track" specification and point to
    (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126.html*section-4.7__;Iw!!PtGJab4!9_juBFGzoFD7ttUitU-KIzteMTFlnXdpQy43IewVscJISi9kaKYHatT31NRsb8iSXpcEJ0jjY0dpU7FbnP3eqL4$ [rfc-editor[.]org]). Even though it puts
    a requirement saying - "Every new top-level type MUST be defined in a Standards
    Track RFC", I don't think it hurts repeating it in IANA consideration.