[Megaco] H.248.64 vs ForCES vs OpenFlow; FW: I-D Action: draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt

"Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)" <albrecht.schwarz@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 02 December 2011 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <albrecht.schwarz@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: megaco@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C6E21F9946 for <megaco@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:50:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LAEkUhdxq5Qb for <megaco@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6033621F93A1 for <megaco@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:50:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id pB29kh0V029822 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:50:08 +0100
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSD2.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.52]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.61]) with mapi; Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:49:56 +0100
From: "Schwarz, Albrecht (Albrecht)" <albrecht.schwarz@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: CHATRAS Bruno RD-CORE-ISS <bruno.chatras@orange-ft.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:49:54 +0100
Thread-Topic: H.248.64 vs ForCES vs OpenFlow; FW: I-D Action: draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt
Thread-Index: Acyw0b1mZgB+i5MASuuh3y0fTiEWmQABaSFg
Message-ID: <5F7BCCF5541B7444830A2288ABBEBC9621619009A9@FRMRSSXCHMBSD2.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83
Cc: "megaco@ietf.org" <megaco@ietf.org>
Subject: [Megaco] H.248.64 vs ForCES vs OpenFlow; FW: I-D Action: draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt
X-BeenThere: megaco@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Media Gateway Control <megaco.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/megaco>, <mailto:megaco-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/megaco>
List-Post: <mailto:megaco@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:megaco-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco>, <mailto:megaco-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:50:21 -0000

Bruno, fyi, a first analysis appears, comparison could be extended for H.248.64 ...
 

-----Original Message-----
From: i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
Sent: Freitag, 2. Dezember 2011 10:07
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action: draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

	Title           : Analysis of Comparisons between OpenFlow and ForCES
	Author(s)       : Zhiliang Wang
                          Tina Tsou
                          Jing Huang
                          Xingang Shi
                          Xia Yin
	Filename        : draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt
	Pages           : 12
	Date            : 2011-12-02

   While both ForCES and OpenFlow follow the basic idea of separations
   of forwarding plane and control plane in network elements, they are
   technically very different. This document analyzes the differences
   between OpenFlow and ForCES technically from the aspects of goals,
   architecture, forwarding model and protocol interface. The two
   techniques can learn much from each other in their standardization
   process.


A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

This Internet-Draft can be retrieved at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-forces-compare-openflow-forces-00.txt

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt