IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [Megaco] What exactly constitutes Version 1 ?

"Paul Long" <plong@ipdialog.com> Fri, 05 October 2001 18:54 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA28727 for <megaco-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 14:54:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA18319; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 14:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA18236 for <megaco@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 14:11:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sm14.texas.rr.com (sm14.texas.rr.com [24.93.35.41]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA27841 for <megaco@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 14:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from plong1 (cs666831-164.austin.rr.com [66.68.31.164]) by sm14.texas.rr.com (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with SMTP id f95IL0Wt011184 for <megaco@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2001 13:21:00 -0500
From: Paul Long <plong@ipdialog.com>
To: megaco@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Megaco] What exactly constitutes Version 1 ?
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 13:10:29 -0500
Message-ID: <NEBBIELHMLDIACLLJHCNKEMDDEAA.plong@ipdialog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0040_01C14D9F.1B479760"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <13D467F625FAD511AE2A00D0B7B917D72AE737@mailserver.netbrahma.com>
Sender: megaco-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: megaco-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Media Gateway Control <megaco.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: megaco@ietf.org

RE: [Megaco] What exactly constitutes Version 1 ?Padma,

I'm confused. What do you mean by "4 byte TPKT header ... instead of
RFC1006." Section 6 in RFC1006 has always defined a 4-byte header for TPKT.

Paul Long
ipDialog, Inc.

  -----Original Message-----
  From: megaco-admin@ietf.org [mailto:megaco-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
Padmaja Musti
  Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 8:50 AM
  To: 'Tom-PT Taylor'; Padmaja Musti; 'Harry Suede'; megaco@ietf.org
  Subject: RE: [Megaco] What exactly constitutes Version 1 ?


  Hi,
  I think in the previous Interops there was confusion on the implementation
of TPKT /RFC1006
  and there was suggestion that 4 byte TPKT header should be used instead of
RFC1006.
  But this is not mentioned in the IG Jun 2001. Was it omitted
inadvertently. For the coming Interop should every one come with 4 byte TPKT
header or RFC1006 implementation.
  regards,
  Padma

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email