Re: [MEXT] draft-arkko-mext-rfc3775-altcoa-check-00.txt

[Jari Arkko <[e-mail]>]

Francis,

> => there is a known case: in the return to home it is useful to have
> different source and care-of addresses. For instance the source address
> can be a link-local address when the care-of address is by definition
> the home address.
> So I propose to relax your new requirement by:
>  1- accepting the source address or the home address as a valid care-of
>   address;
>  2- make the check policy-based with the check "on" for the default policy
>   ("on" ::= perform the check and reject the BU when it fails).
>   

OK -- thanks for this. I actually already changed this due to someone
else's comment. The text now reads:

"If the address in the Alternate Care-of Address option is not the same
as either the home address or the Source Address field in the IPv6
header of the Binding Update packet, then ..."

Jari


_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[e-mail]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext