IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MEXT] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-00.txt

"George Tsirtsis" <tsirtsis@googlemail.com> Tue, 25 March 2008 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-mext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97AE3A6780; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.872
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.872 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.057, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I-ySuLn5ZkuZ; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8E93A6E2E; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E593A6D0B for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dVxOvdo29n9J for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.190]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6F03A6780 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1478120rvb.49 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.251.1 with SMTP id y1mr3109129rvh.149.1206442162771; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.135.15 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d3886a520803250349j3380584cj8ff0d9aa8134068@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:49:22 +0000
From: George Tsirtsis <tsirtsis@googlemail.com>
To: Netlmm <netlmm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080325104501.8FC4428C302@core3.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080325104501.8FC4428C302@core3.amsl.com>
Cc: mext@ietf.org
Subject: [MEXT] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi all,

Krishnan and I put together a draft describing what the expected
behavior of a combined LMA/HA implementation should be. This should
help the discussions around the so called scenario C of the PMIP-MIPv6
interactions draft (draft-giaretta-netlmm-mip-interactions).

I hope you find the discussion in this draft useful.
Please let us know if you have any comments/questions.

Regards
George


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org>
Date: 2008/3/25
Subject: I-D Action:draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-00.txt
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

        Title           : Behavior of Collocated HA/LMA
        Author(s)       : G. Tsirtsis, S. Krishnan
        Filename        : draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-00.txt
        Pages           : 9
        Date            : 2008-03-25

 In discussions about PMIPv6-MIPv6 interactions in NETLMM WG, scenario
 C describes the case of collocation of LMA and HA function.  In this
 case a PMIP network emulates the "home link" for MNs using MIPv6.
 This document argues that even when LMA and HA functions are
 Collocated they MUST be treated as logically separate entities.  In
 particular this draft argues that PMIP BCEs MUST NOT overwrite MIPv6
 BCEs and vice versa.

 A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
 http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tsirtsis-logically-separate-lmaha-00.txt

 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
 ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/

 Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
 implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
 Internet-Draft.


_______________________________________________
 I-D-Announce mailing list
 I-D-Announce@ietf.org
 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
 Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
 or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email