[MEXT] Adoption of FW docs as MEXT WG drafts

Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net> Tue, 17 June 2008 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mext-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-mext-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0317928C10E; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE353A6A80 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B0aN0ehGv9BN for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4A53A698A for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:43:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c28so4547014ika.5 for <mext@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:mime-version:content-disposition:message-id :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=mTBdNdy+JGtgoNXYqOia5/2z/yXpYkb9lq0dW1YUgDk=; b=x743Vb5nNLPMw67Mw8yd0IYl4TKYfOa6bAFefbMjl/Jk5nIbxRjnq3aLu6BtPh0YxR f6VsiGeuyLQ1DsfgMdyurFcWZmTinsmiPpWJg6JFvn6a7c3HmEJvMCqFd9hsRiRSccct mtFWVLxEodtX5oRDHVAALj2dHVUZAdG12aEhw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:mime-version:content-disposition :message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=P6YeiBBNEHgwLIrofe0nuvHuQ5/LyCQcZU/ESLSCKFkTAqPuq+Y0pC5/6Q53KwCOoS L+Hfw+BzwmXVH2Q3RklZcb0eUR11H6X9sPgN6Bh0BqUXymbOXgae2udW0FQC2reUz9My OiO9DkhxeLjZdRU6eNpUbH36XFsYSiyGQdw5k=
Received: by 10.210.138.7 with SMTP id l7mr7576777ebd.108.1213706626893; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from klee.local ( [212.119.9.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j8sm12111915gvb.1.2008.06.17.05.43.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:43:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net>
To: mext@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:43:46 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200806171443.46977.julien.IETF@laposte.net>
Subject: [MEXT] Adoption of FW docs as MEXT WG drafts
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: mext-bounces@ietf.org

Folks,

We are chartered to produce informational documents describing Mobile 
IPv6 Operation with Firewalls but so far we have no corresponding WG 
drafts. 

There are two individual submissions filling this hole together:

- Guidelines for firewall vendors regarding MIPv6 traffic
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-krishnan-mip6-firewall-admin-04.txt>

-Guidelines for firewall administrators regarding MIPv6 traffic
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-krishnan-mip6-firewall-admin-04.txt>

They have been updated as per comments received during last IETF meeting 
and we agreed we would ask for their adoption as WG drafts. Hereby we'd 
like to request the WG participants to answer the following question:

Shall the two drafts above be made WG drafts?

Thank you for your support.

--julien & marcelo, MEXT chairs.
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
MEXT@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext