Re: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00
"Mohana Jeyatharan" <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com> Mon, 05 April 2010 00:19 UTC
Return-Path: <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com>
X-Original-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC9C3A67F6 for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 17:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.11
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.11 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, J_CHICKENPOX_37=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r1ghLEqVtaIL for <mext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 17:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mei.co.jp (smtp.mei.co.jp [133.183.100.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924D63A67A5 for <mext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 17:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw.jp.panasonic.com ([157.8.1.145]) by smtp.mei.co.jp (8.12.11.20060614/3.7W/kc-maile12) with ESMTP id o350IiRC023710; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:18:44 +0900 (JST)
Received: from pslexc01.psl.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jp.panasonic.com (8.11.6p2/3.7W/kc-maili06) with ESMTP id o350IhZ13112; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:18:43 +0900 (JST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:17:07 +0800
Message-ID: <5F09D220B62F79418461A978CA0921BD04051A7B@pslexc01.psl.local>
In-Reply-To: <00a001cad1aa$59b6d400$510c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00
Thread-Index: AcrPo04uq9v8I2dXQ2Sgwl93JNmhEgBe7vggAAPUADAAHnVEgACq9Hog
From: Mohana Jeyatharan <Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com>
To: Frank Xia <xiayangsong@huawei.com>, mext <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00
X-BeenThere: mext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobile IPv6 EXTensions WG <mext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mext>
List-Post: <mailto:mext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext>, <mailto:mext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 00:19:08 -0000
Hi Frank, Please see below. BR, Mohana > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Xia [mailto:xiayangsong@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 10:48 PM > To: Mohana Jeyatharan; 'mext' > Subject: RE: [MEXT] Any Comments > fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00 > > Hi Mohana > > Please check my replies again.. > > BR > Frank > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mohana Jeyatharan [mailto:Mohana.Jeyatharan@sg.panasonic.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:27 PM > To: Frank Xia; mext > Subject: RE: [MEXT] Any Comments > fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00 > > Hi Frank, > > Thank you for some quick comments. > > Please see some replies below. > > BR, > Mohana > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frank Xia [mailto:xiayangsong@huawei.com] > > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 6:19 AM > > To: Mohana Jeyatharan; 'mext' > > Subject: RE: [MEXT] Any Comments > > fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00 > > > > Hi Mohana > > > > I had a quick glance. > > It is interesting. > > > > Some clarification questions are below: > > 1)is TFT(Traffic Flow Template)implementation > > mandatory for 3GPP mobile node? > > I think so from your document. > > If 3GPP network entitiy decides per flow QoS treatment needed > for a given prefix/HoA, then dedicated bearers will be > created by network and such TFTs will be assigned. In such a > case, the 3GPP MN needs to understand the TFT when sending > data. Thus I would say it is mandatory for the MN. However, > it is not mandatory to create dedicated bearers. If there are > no dedicated bearers and TFT, the MN will not have TFTs stored in it. > Frank=>I am sure about your answer, yes or not. > " If 3GPP network entitiy decides per flow QoS treatment > needed for a given prefix/HoA ..". I assume per flow > treatment is a prerequisite for 3GPP when we talk about flow > binding topic. So, I think your answer is yes. Yes, the answer is yes. TFT feature for MN is mandatory. > > 2)is it has the same descriptive capability as > > draft-ietf-mext-binary-ts-04.txt? > > I think so. > The TFT reference traffic selector suboption is different > from the binary TS traffic selector sub option. In TFT Ref > sub option, the data field only carries the bearer ID to > describe the packet filters. > Multiple packet filters are collapsed to a single bearer ID. > Moreover, when there is change in packet filters tied to TFT, > a simple refresh flowbinding would do as described in the > TFT-ref draft. Thus there are some subtle differences > between the two. > > > However, in highlevel both are describing flows when setting > filter rules. > But, what we are highlighting here is that, when TFTs are > present at the 3g bearer filtering table, and the MN wants > such flows to be sent via 3G path, a simple reference to the > TFT is an easier way to set flow binding rules. > Frank=>Did you contribute this to 3GPP? IMHO, TFT is a > better way to incorporate into current 3GPP system. The TFT reference as a new traffic selector sub-option format needs to be specified in IETF. Following that it can be used in 3GPP. Yes, using a TFT to describe the flows in flow binding operation is useful in 3GPP scenarios as highlighted in the draft. > > > > BR > > Frank > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mext-bounces@ietf.org] > On Behalf > > Of Mohana Jeyatharan > > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 7:53 PM > > To: mext > > Subject: [MEXT] Any Comments for > > draft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00 > > > > Hi all, > > > > During last IETF-77 MEXT session we could not present the ID > > draft-jeyatharan-mext-flow-tftemp-reference-00 and get the direct > > feedback from the WG. > > > > Would really appreciate if we can get some comments on this > draft and > > general opinion about this draft from the WG. > > > > The mechanism highlighted in this draft is a simple > mechanism to set > > flow binding rules for flows that have descriptors present > at the HA > > and MN, using a reference to the TFT as a flow descriptor. > > > > Thanks. > > > > BR, > > Mohana > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MEXT mailing list > > MEXT@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext > > > > > >
- Re: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-… Mohana Jeyatharan
- [MEXT] Any Comments for draft-jeyatharan-mext-flo… Mohana Jeyatharan
- Re: [MEXT] Any Comments for draft-jeyatharan-mext… Frank Xia
- Re: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-… Mohana Jeyatharan
- Re: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-… Frank Xia
- Re: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-… Frank Xia
- Re: [MEXT] Any Comments fordraft-jeyatharan-mext-… Mohana Jeyatharan