Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Advice please: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 6445<draft-ietf-mpls-fastreroute-mib-21.txt>

I agree with Bert and Juergen. It's a simple change in the names +
LAST-UPDATED clause. 

Whoever implemented a pre-RFC version did this on his own
responsibility. 

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mib-doctors-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mib-doctors-
> bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bert Wijnen (IETF)
> Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2011 9:49 AM
> To: Adrian Farrel; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; mib-doctors@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Advice please: AUTH48 [LB]: RFC 6445<draft-
> ietf-mpls-fastreroute-mib-21.txt>
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/4/11 9:38 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > The document editor has responded to the RFC Editor that these are
> just compiler
> >>  warning and:
> >>
> >> >  >  These warnings can safely be ignored.  Making the changes
> necessary to
> >> >  >  avoid those warnings will require significant changes to the
> MIB, and will
> >> >  >  not be of any real substantive change for implementations
> 
> I believe that the change to lower case should be made.
> 
> I do not understand that the document editor claims "will require
> significant
> changes to the MIB". I can hardly believe that it takes more than some
> minutes.
> 
> Bert
> _______________________________________________
> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors