Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Float32? and NHDP-MIB reviewer

"Joan Cucchiara" <jcucchiara@mindspring.com> Thu, 02 December 2010 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446733A67B7 for <mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:26:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTYexKJOVthb for <mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995793A63EB for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 14:26:14 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=EXLlf82GUrEivmfGGteLGjzGo6E9a7NEwu3GpHm71EbOkOO9IJwH7Jo92q5Lr4UF; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [108.1.134.122] (helo=JoanPC) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>) id 1POHcf-0003ol-B3; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:27:29 -0500
Message-ID: <07c701cb9270$1d5dcc70$6501a8c0@JoanPC>
From: Joan Cucchiara <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>
To: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
References: <1290976326.1503.6.camel@chapman><4CF3693B.1010800@bwijnen.net><20101129091704.GC39405@elstar.local><1291138982.1662.2.camel@chapman><20101130204706.GC46471@elstar.local><1291300558.1607.4.camel@chapman><4CF7B45F.9020900@bwijnen.net> <20101202151642.GA4795@elstar.local><001801cb923f$ef3f7760$6801a8c0@oemcomputer> <4CF8152F.4070905@bwijnen.net>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 17:27:33 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-ELNK-Trace: 4d68bbe9cb71969ea344cf2d1a8e60840a9da525759e265430c91ae687fd9b8912b827dfd9e3228a510ab3ad090af031350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 108.1.134.122
Cc: mib-doctors@ietf.org, Robert G Cole <rgcole01@comcast.net>, Ulrich Herberg <ulrich@herberg.name>, Juergen Quittek <quittek@netlab.nec.de>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Float32? and NHDP-MIB reviewer
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:26:16 -0000

I agree that Standard's track is best for this also.

Thanks,
  -Joan


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
To: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
Cc: <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; "Robert G Cole" <rgcole01@comcast.net>; "Ulrich 
Herberg" <ulrich@herberg.name>; "Juergen Quittek" <quittek@netlab.nec.de>
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 4:52 PM
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Float32? and NHDP-MIB reviewer


>I agree that STDs track would be best
>
> Bert
>
> On 12/2/10 5:42 PM, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>> Hi -
>>
>> My most recent, the breathtakingly trivial RFC 6082, took just
>> short of five months, so I agree with Juergen's timeline assessment.
>>
>> For purposes of re-use of these TCs, I believe it's best for the
>> document to be standards-track.  (Unless folks are comfortable
>> making normative references to "informational.")
>>
>> Randy
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Juergen Schoenwaelder"<j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
>>> To: "Bert (IETF) Wijnen"<bertietf@bwijnen.net>
>>> Cc:<mib-doctors@ietf.org>; "Robert G Cole"<rgcole01@comcast.net>; 
>>> "Ulrich Herberg"<ulrich@herberg.name>; "Juergen Quittek"
>> <quittek@netlab.nec.de>
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 7:16 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] Float32? and NHDP-MIB reviewer
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 03:59:43PM +0100, Bert (IETF) Wijnen wrote:
>>>
>>>> But in any event, it will take a while (as does virtually ervery
>>>> document in IETF).
>>> The fastest thing I have done in recent years was RFC 4789 - which
>>> took about 6 months from the very start to publication of the RFC (and
>>> this was an AD sponsored individual submission). The timeline can be
>>> found here:
>>>
>>>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schoenw-snmp-ether/history/
>>>
>>> You might save 2-3 weeks at the very beginning and another 1-2 weeks
>>> by avoiding the summer break. I guess 5 months is pretty much what you
>>> will need to expect - until publication.
>>>
>>> /js
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
>>> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103<http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
>>> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors