RE: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-10.txt

Sorry, wrong message. 

The WGLC message will show up separately. 

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) 
> Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2007 1:28 PM
> To: MIB Doctors (E-mail)
> Subject: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-10.txt
> 
>  MIB Doctors,
> 
> If you have some time please have a look at this document in 
> WGLC in PWE3. 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny McPherson [mailto:danny@tcb.net]
> Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 1:59 PM
> To: Orly Nicklass
> Cc: Nadeau Thomas; Stewart Bryant; David Zelig; Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-mib-10.txt
> 
> 
> On Mar 3, 2007, at 4:55 AM, Orly Nicklass wrote:
> 
> > I hope to be able review the 3 drafts I marked below, soon.
> 
> Perfect, thanks!
> >
> > Did you get an update on your status as MIB Doctor and 
> whether that'll
> 
> > suffice for review here, or do you believe there's something 
> > additional (e.g., additional LC notify or review request) 
> we should do
> 
> > as well?
> > I spoke with Dan and WGLC is valid after my reviews, as for 
> IETF LC we
> 
> > will need additional MIB DR for the drafts where  I was an actual 
> > editor.
> 
> Ahh, our emails crossed paths in flight :-)  You answered my other
> question, so as it stands:
> 
> I'll WG LC TDM & ATM once I give a quick review, early next 
> week at the
> latest.
> 
> I'll wait on your review and potential update or OK on the 
> ENET, MPLS &
> CEP MIBs.
> 
> And all MIBs which you're an another need to revisit the MIB 
> DR after WG
> LC before IETF LC, got it.
> 
> Thanks Orly!
> 
> -danny
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
> MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors
> 

_______________________________________________
MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
MIB-DOCTORS@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors