[MIB-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for January 24, 2008 Telechat

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

 
Please find below the preliminary agenda for the 1/24 IESG telechat. Please let me know if there are any comments or concerns until Wednesday 1/23 COB the latest. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


 

-----Original Message-----
From: IESG Secretary [mailto:[e-mail]] 


INTERNET ENGINEERING STEERING GROUP (IESG)
Summarized Agenda for the January 24, 2008 IESG Teleconference

This agenda was generated at 19:22:38 EDT, January 17, 2008
Web version of this agenda can be found at:
http://www.ietf.org/IESG/agenda.html
                                                                         
      

2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-btns-core-06.txt
    Better-Than-Nothing-Security: An Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec
(Proposed 
    Standard) - 1 of 4 
    Note: The proto shepherd is Julien Laganier 
    Token: Sam Hartman
  o draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-13.txt
    The EAP TLS Authentication Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 4 
    Note: Joe Salowey  is the proto shepherd 
    Token: Sam Hartman
  o draft-ietf-manet-packetbb-11.txt
    Generalized MANET Packet/Message Format (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 4 
    Token: Ross Callon
  o draft-ietf-manet-timetlv-04.txt
    Representing multi-value time in MANETs (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4 
    Token: Ross Callon

2.1.2 Returning Item
  o draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09.txt
    Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 
    Multihoming (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 2 
    Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability. Mark is
handling 
    this for Jari as he is an author 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-shim6-proto-09.txt
    Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for IPv6 (Proposed Standard)
- 2 
    of 2 
    Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability. Document
Shepherd is 
    Geoff Huston <[e-mail]> 
    Token: Jari Arkko

2.1.3 For Action
  o draft-ietf-shim6-hba-05.txt
    Hash Based Addresses (HBA) (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 
    Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability. Mark Townsley
to 
    handle any IPR questions in AD review/IETF LC/IESG, if any. Document 
    Shepherd is Geoff Huston <[e-mail]>. 
    Token: Jari Arkko

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
  o draft-gulbrandsen-imap-enable-05.txt
    The IMAP ENABLE Extension (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 1 
    Note: Alexey Melnikov is the document shepherd 
    Token: Chris Newman

2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-06.txt
    IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in 802.16 Networks (Informational) - 1 of 1

    Token: Ron Bonica

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
  o draft-evain-ebu-urn-02.txt
    A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the European Broadcasting
Union 
    (EBU) (Informational) - 1 of 2 
    Token: Lisa Dusseault
  o draft-dondeti-oma-mmusic-sdp-attrs-00.txt
    Session Description Protocol (SDP) Attributes for OMA BCAST Service
and 
    Content Protection (Informational) - 2 of 2 
    Token: Cullen Jennings

3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.


3.3.1 New Item
  o draft-levis-provider-qos-agreement-04.txt
    Considerations of provider-to-provider agreements for Internet-scale
QoS 
    (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Magnus Westerlund

3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
    NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
  o vCard and CardDAV (vcarddav) - 1 of 2
    Token: Chris Newman
  o Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks (roll) - 2 of 2
    Token: David Ward



_______________________________________________
MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors