[MIB-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for March 27, 2008 Telechat

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[e-mail]>]

Please find below the preliminary agenda of the IESG telechat on 3/27.
Please read the relevant documents and send me any comments, questions
and concerns until COB Wednesday 3/26.

Thanks and Regards, 

2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-mipshop-fmipv6-rfc4068bis-06.txt
    Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers (Proposed Standard) - 1 of 3 
    Note: Document Shepherd is Vijay Devarapalli 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-ietf-netconf-notification-12.txt
    NETCONF Event Notifications (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 3 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-rohc-rfc3095bis-rohcv2-profiles-06.txt
    RObust Header Compression Version 2 (ROHCv2): Profiles for RTP, UDP,
IP, 
    ESP and UDP Lite (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 3 
    Token: Magnus Westerlund

2.1.2 Returning Item
  o draft-ietf-imapext-sort-20.txt
    INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - SORT AND THREAD EXTENSIONS
(Proposed 
    Standard) - 1 of 4 
    Token: Lisa Dusseault
  o draft-ietf-nsis-ntlp-15.txt
    GIST: General Internet Signalling Transport (Proposed Standard) - 2
of
4 
    Note: WG Shepherd: John Loughney ([e-mail]).
Abstainers
 
    please re-review your motivations in regards to the updated version.

    Token: Magnus Westerlund
  o draft-ietf-mip6-hiopt-11.txt
    DHCP Options for Home Information Discovery in MIPv6 (Proposed
Standard) - 
    3 of 4 
    Note: Document Shepherd is Basavaraj Patil 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt
    Proxy Mobile IPv6 (Proposed Standard) - 4 of 4 
    Note: Document Shepherd is Jonne Soininen 
    Token: Jari Arkko


2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
  o draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis-08.txt
    Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs (BCP)
-
1 of 
    1 
    Token: Russ Housley


3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-mipshop-3gfh-05.txt
    Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers for 3G CDMA Networks (Informational) - 1
of
4 
    Note: Document Shepherd is Vijay Devarapalli 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-eval-05.txt
    Evaluation of existing GMPLS Protocols against Multi Layer and Multi
Region 
    Networks (MLN/MRN) (Informational) - 2 of 4 
    Token: Ross Callon
  o draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-mln-reqs-08.txt
    Requirements for GMPLS-Based Multi-Region and Multi-Layer Networks 
    (MRN/MLN) (Informational) - 3 of 4 
    Token: Ross Callon
  o draft-ietf-l1vpn-applicability-basic-mode-04.txt
    Applicability Statement for Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks
(L1VPNs)
Basic 
    Mode (Informational) - 4 of 4 
    Token: David Ward

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.


3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
    NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
  o Internationalized Domain Name (idn) - 1 of 1
    Token: Lisa Dusseault
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
  o Multiparty Multimedia Session Control (mmusic) - 1 of 1
    Token: Cullen Jennings
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
    NONE


_______________________________________________
MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors