Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-06
"Bert Wijnen \(IETF\)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net> Tue, 09 February 2010 08:42 UTC
Return-Path: <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E145A3A69D6 for <mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:42:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.611, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZ8PH6m+rSYd for <mib-doctors@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:42:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.versatel.net (relay56.tele2.vuurwerk.nl [62.250.3.56]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53F03A67DF for <mib-doctors@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Feb 2010 00:42:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [87.215.199.34] (helo=BertLaptop) by relay.versatel.net with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <bertietf@bwijnen.net>) id 1Nelgu-0007CT-6Y; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:43:28 +0100
Message-ID: <67602C6F35AA43CA82FC1CAD4E0F98E0@BertLaptop>
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
References: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401F0DB4C@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401F0DB4C@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:42:37 +0100
Organization: Consultant
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1220_01CAA96C.36C8C590"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18005
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18005
Cc: "MIB Doctors (E-mail)" <mib-doctors@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-06
X-BeenThere: mib-doctors@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: MIB Doctors list <mib-doctors.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mib-doctors>
List-Post: <mailto:mib-doctors@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors>, <mailto:mib-doctors-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:42:26 -0000
Dan, I did another review - SMICng syntax check is clean - The MIB module has improved dramatically and they have addressed all my comments, except maybe: - Most DisplayString objects have been changed into Utf8String objects. But I still see a few objects where they use DisplayString. I understand that in these cases there will (most probably) never be international text. So I think I can live with it. At the other hand, I do not see what the problem would be to also make those utf8 based. If the content is ASCII, then basically that is exactly the same, no matter if it is repreented in UTF8 or ASCII. Oh well... I would not hold up the document for it though. - Now that they use Utf8String (from RFC 2287), I think that RFC2287 should be added as a normative reference. Bert ----- Original Message ----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) To: Bert Wijnen (IETF) Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 1:37 PM Subject: FW: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-06 Hi Bert, Can you please check the revised version of the document? Your original review is attached. Thanks and Regards, Dan -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Droms [mailto:rdroms@cisco.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 2:50 PM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Subject: draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-06 Dan - would you please review draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-06 and decide whether your DISCUSS issues from the previous revision have addressed and you can clear your DISCUSS? Thanks. - Ralph
- Re: [MIB-DOCTORS] draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-mib-06 Bert Wijnen (IETF)