[midcom] Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?
Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de> Fri, 06 December 2002 09:47 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA00287 for <midcom-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 04:47:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gB69o1312645 for midcom-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 04:50:01 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB69kKv12503; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 04:46:20 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB69jqv12478 for <midcom@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 04:45:52 -0500
Received: from tokyo.ccrle.nec.de (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA00167 for <midcom@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 04:42:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de (imap [192.168.102.11]) by tokyo.ccrle.nec.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB69jcF29113; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:45:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de)
Received: from ccrle.nec.de (martin.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de [192.168.102.180]) by imap.heidelberg.ccrle.nec.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux eMail Server 3.0) with ESMTP id A2B8060160; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:43:30 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <3DF07145.2070803@ccrle.nec.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 10:43:33 +0100
From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de>
Organization: NEC -- Network Labs Europe
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0rc3) Gecko/20020619
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Cc: snmpv3@lists.tislabs.com, midcom@ietf.org
References: <3DEF6197.100@ccrle.nec.de> <200212051517.gB5FHiSY013128@hansa.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [midcom] Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions?
Sender: midcom-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: midcom-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: midcom@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom>, <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <midcom.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:midcom@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom>, <mailto:midcom-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Juergen, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: >>>>>>Martin Stiemerling writes: >>>>> > > Martin> as you may have heard: the MIDCOM WG is currently doing a > Martin> protocol evaluation which protocol to use as the MIDCOM > Martin> protocol. SNMPv3 is amongst these candidates (diameter, > Martin> cops(-pr), megaco). Would you strongly recommend to use > Martin> SNMPv3 as the MIDCOM protocol without having a bad feeling? > > Feeling is one dimension in a multi-dimensional space. And we all know > that SNMP has a reputation which is kind of special. > > Anyway, it usually makes sense to also look at the functional > requirements and the features offered by a protocol if you are not > completely driven by feelings. Are the MIDCOM requirements spelled out > somewhere? Yes, they are: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3303.txt (architecture und framework) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3304.txt (requirements) The actual protocol evaluation is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-midcom-protocol-eval-06.txt Thanks in advance Martin > > /js > -- ************************************************ NEW ADDRESS EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 23RD Kurfuersten-Anlage 34, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany phone, fax and email remain unchanged ************************************************ Martin Stiemerling NEC Europe Ltd. -- Network Laboratories Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de IPv4: http://www.ccrle.nec.de IPv6: http://www.ipv6.ccrle.nec.de _______________________________________________ midcom mailing list midcom@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/midcom
- [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Hahn, Scott
- [midcom] Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Moisand, Jerome
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Melinda Shore
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Moisand, Jerome
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Melinda Shore
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Moisand, Jerome
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Melinda Shore
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Eliot Lear
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Durham, David
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Melinda Shore
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Melinda Shore
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Wes Hardaker
- [midcom] Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Juergen Quittek
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Scott Bradner
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Mary Barnes
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Juergen Quittek
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Mary Barnes
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Moisand, Jerome
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Eric Burger
- RE: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Harrington, David
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- FW: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- FW: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Bob Natale
- Re: [midcom] RE: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opini… Melinda Shore
- [midcom] Re: SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Martin Stiemerling
- FW: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- FW: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- Re: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Bob Penfield
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Cedric Aoun
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- Re: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Bob Penfield
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- direction of SNMP traps (was: RE: [midcom] SNMPv3… Juergen Quittek
- RE: direction of SNMP traps (was: RE: [midcom] SN… Pyda Srisuresh
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Cedric Aoun
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David
- RE: [midcom] SNMPv3 as MIDCOM protocol: Opinions? Harrington, David