[mif] comment about draft-mrw-mif-current-practices-01.txt

marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Mon, 16 March 2009 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0539F3A697D for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.201, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EVmU7Kp5VNso for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp03.uc3m.es [163.117.176.133]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258B83A687E for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from marcelo-bagnulos-macbook-pro.local (173.pool85-53-142.dynamic.orange.es [85.53.142.173]) by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0ABF730CEF for <mif@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:36:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <49BEB858.5030205@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:36:40 +0100
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mif <mif@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-5.6.0.1016-16524.002
Subject: [mif] comment about draft-mrw-mif-current-practices-01.txt
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:36:04 -0000

Hi,

This document includes very interesting information about how current 
implementations deal with the different problems.
One suggestion that i think it would help improve the document would be 
to link it more directly to the problems described in the problem 
statement. Of course, we need to decide on one problem statement 
document before, but..

What i mean, is that the problem statement documents describe a set of 
problems, like dealing with DNS issues, default router selection and so 
on and it is not directly obvious from the document in its current form 
how the current implementations deal with the issues. For instance, it 
is not obvious from this document how current implementations deal with 
the dual faced dns issue, which i guess many implementations actually 
handle pretty well.


So, i guess that once we have identified the relevant problems we want 
to work on, in the section for each implementation
it would be good to have a sub section for each of the problems 
identified in the problem statement and describing how the particular 
implementation deals with the particular problem.


Regards, marcelo