[mif] 答复: Questions in last 95th MIF meeting

GENG Liang <liang.geng@hotmail.com> Fri, 22 April 2016 04:37 UTC

Return-Path: <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4FB12E047 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.615
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.615 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U28nfAH5cFxX for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU004-OMC4S29.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s29.hotmail.com [65.55.111.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92D8312E504 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.111.136]) by BLU004-OMC4S29.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 21 Apr 2016 21:37:29 -0700
Received: from SG2APC01FT059.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.51) by SG2APC01HT100.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.251.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.453.6; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 04:37:27 +0000
Received: from SG2PR06MB0934.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.152.250.60) by SG2APC01FT059.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.251.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.453.6 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 04:37:27 +0000
Received: from SG2PR06MB0934.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.204.155]) by SG2PR06MB0934.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.204.155]) with mapi id 15.01.0466.023; Fri, 22 Apr 2016 04:37:27 +0000
From: GENG Liang <liang.geng@hotmail.com>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>, "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>, "Margaret Cullen" <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [mif] Questions in last 95th MIF meeting
Thread-Index: AQHRm+GSbzVRj8cBf0S97vm6/K5ySJ+VUbvu
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 04:37:26 +0000
Message-ID: <SG2PR06MB09342CD9596075DC0970D4A7876F0@SG2PR06MB0934.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
References: <COL125-W6FE908A798F23A69D7D8DB16E0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <COL125-W6FE908A798F23A69D7D8DB16E0@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 25.152.250.60) smtp.mailfrom=hotmail.com; hotmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;hotmail.com; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=hotmail.com;
received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning hotmail.com discourages use of 25.152.250.60 as permitted sender)
x-tmn: [qqjmqm5Z75B0oWGPs95c4lbgJx6SMMiRWH396rxuyFc=]
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:25.152.250.60; IPV:NLI; CTRY:GB; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SG2APC01HT100; H:SG2PR06MB0934.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:SoftFail; MLV:ovrnspm; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 70a358e7-b24b-4bfa-c8e5-08d36a67ceac
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(5061506196)(5061507196); SRVR:SG2APC01HT100;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:SG2APC01HT100; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SG2APC01HT100;
x-forefront-prvs: 0920602B08
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SG2PR06MB09342CD9596075DC0970D4A7876F0SG2PR06MB0934apcp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Apr 2016 04:37:26.9883 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT100
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2016 04:37:29.0756 (UTC) FILETIME=[ADCB65C0:01D19C50]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/G1k6IgdDlatRmNNsd93o3S_k9Uk>
Subject: [mif] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogIFF1ZXN0aW9ucyBpbiBsYXN0IDk1dGggTUlGIG1l?= =?gb2312?b?ZXRpbmc=?=
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 04:37:33 -0000

 Hi All,

1) Yes, I am working on PvDs


2) I think there are plenty of work to do using the PvD concept and rechartering MIF to focus on specific working items seems a very reasonable idea. In terms  of interests, there are many on-going discussions , i.e. the implementation of PvD between Homenet and MIF . Hence I don't think we are lack of people who are interested in working on PvDs.

Moreover, regarding the IPR issue, another point I would like to make is that having RAND IPR claims in this working group is not really a bad thing. Potential users of this technology would be happy to see those IPR claimed in IETF rather than discretely claimed under the table. Also some of the IPRs may not be valid any more since we may work around them as we move on.

3) Yes, I would like to continue the work on PvDs.


Best wishes
Liang



________________________________
发件人: mif <mif-bounces@ietf.org>; 代表 Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>;
发送时间: 2016年4月21日 15:21
收件人: mif@ietf.org; Margaret Cullen
主题: [mif] Questions in last 95th MIF meeting

Hello all

Chairs would like to ask questions again in the list about rechartering for AD's reference due to lacking of participation.

Q1: Are you working on PVDs?

Q2: What do you think that MIF should do at this moment?
1) Recharter
2) Hiatus
3) Close

Q3: Do you like to work on PvDS?

Many thanks for your feedback

Cochairs.