Re: [mif] Call for WG adoption

I support adoption.

Nit: "ortunneling" should split.

Architecturally  speaking, I wonder whether the semantics of querying
the obtention of a PVD based on an IP address is described.

Let me explain why.

We are considering locally the expression of an energy metric in a PVD.
  This would for example be sent by the network to the mobile telling it
that one of its interfaces is that much energy-hungry.

But the other way around should also be possible: a mobile may request
an interface to the network how many Joules are needed to reach a
particular IP destination.

For that to work, there would be need for the mobile to query the
network using an IP address as key, and obtaining a particular PVD.
This is akin to the option of sending an Neighbor Solicitation for a
particular Target address.

I had a look at the section 2.4 "PVD Identifying/Naming" but I could not
find an indication that would consider that a PVD Identifier be an IP
address.

Alex

Le 07/01/2014 06:44, Hui Deng a écrit :
> Hello all, Please express your opinion whether you would like to have
> below draft adopted as the WG document?
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-anipko-mif-mpvd-arch-05.txt Thanks,
> -cochairs of WG
>
>
> _______________________________________________ mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>