Re: [mif] Announcing draft-mouton-mif-dhcpv6-drlo-00 about default route with DHCPv6

Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 18 August 2011 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1201D21F8A6C for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.088, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXqLThsUofQb for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f45.google.com (mail-pz0-f45.google.com [209.85.210.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B6721F871E for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so4833267pzk.18 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rjn3RGylg1sENbSDyv2+yu+ToC/1Vmc+J8nYBoFJggY=; b=QMYMm6U7EXjfl5pBdq97ANVjDAQZgVnql2PY+B0d4pleJtpC3iO7gX5XrmT6RFJvL3 p2SvH4HMGByJ5AhEyrN6yCcWIGOwZ/hwl4sNmce6cVnWFHxwxEez7l4LBaMnuTjreAJY wfnmaGU8lB7l3s/Bjt00szlWPQDAF49/dkEzA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.201.6 with SMTP id y6mr344205wff.314.1313669519980; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.211.4 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 05:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E381663.7070109@gmail.com>
References: <4E381663.7070109@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:11:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFFjW4g4p59O1xPzBcOiveK4rZ2T8Ya4atqf1=dq6Lvxjw_0zQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wojciech Dec <wdec.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd32be017391004aac685af"
Cc: mif <mif@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mif] Announcing draft-mouton-mif-dhcpv6-drlo-00 about default route with DHCPv6
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:11:07 -0000

Hello Alex,

reading through the draft, other than it proposing a new option with a
different format, could you elaborate on why/what is the issue in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-02 for
conveying the default router info (which the draft already covers)?

Thanks,
Wojciech.

On 2 August 2011 17:23, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear MIF,
>
> We would like to announce a new draft focusing to offer default route
> with DHCPv6:
>
>           "Default Router List Option for DHCPv6 (DRLO)"
>               draft-mouton-mif-dhcpv6-drlo-**00.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/**draft-mouton-mif-dhcpv6-drlo-**00.txt<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mouton-mif-dhcpv6-drlo-00.txt>
>
> Thank you in advance for commenting on this draft.
>
> Alex and Maximilien
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------
> Implementation Details
>
> A prototype linux implementation is ongoing, and modifies ISC Client and
> Server; Relay works unmodified.
>
> A wireshark capture is attached (dissector code available upon request).
>
> Server uses a new pattern of 'format codes' "6SmMoA", and the conf file
> says:
> [...]
>
>> option dhcp6.default-router 2002:c130:13c1:11f::ff 8400
>> 00:07:32:06:7e:72,2002:c130:**13c1:11f:13c1:11f::fe 88
>> 00:07:32:06:7e:73 ,2002:c130:13c1:11f::f5 8300 ;
>>
> [...]
>
> Client conf file says:
>
>> interface "eth0"{ request
>> dhcp6.domain-search,dhcp6.**name-servers,dhcp6.default-**router; }
>>
> Client says:
>
>> RCV:  X-- Server ID: 00:01:00:01:15:67:c9:7d:00:12:**3f:1c:a2:95
>> RCV:  | | X-- TEST_AJOUT eth0 et 0 et 2.
>> RCV:  | | X-- DEFAULT_ROUTER_ADDR 2002:c130:13c1:11f::ff.
>> RCV:  | | | X-- Default_router_lifetime 8000.
>> RCV:  | | | X-- Default_router_link_layer_addr 00:22:68:17:59:ae.
>> RCV:  | | X-- TEST_AJOUT eth0 et 0 et 2.
>> RCV:  | | X-- DEFAULT_ROUTER_ADDR 2002:c130:13c1:11f::fe.
>> RCV:  | | | X-- Default_router_lifetime 8400.
>> RCV:  | | | X-- Default_router_link_layer_addr 00:07:32:06:7e:72.
>> RCV:  Advertisement recorded.
>>
>
> After execution of the DHCP exchange, the neigh cache is (note "expires"
> corresponding to the lifetime):
>
>> # ip -6 route show
>>
> [...]
>
>> default via 2002:c130:13c1:11f::ff dev eth0  proto kernel metric 1024
>> expires 7752sec mtu 1500 advmss 1440 hoplimit 0
>>
> [...]
>
> Thank you for considering this draft.
>
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>