Re: [mif] Issue: message size for communicating the default route? draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Fri, 30 March 2012 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC9C21F86BA for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.171
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.171 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.922, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vCIsf7GR+Lx3 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.144]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDC121F869E for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id q2UCZjqI016496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:35:45 +0200
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2UCZi2w002718 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:35:45 +0200 (envelope-from alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id q2UCZf7c017784 for <mif@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:35:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4F75A89D.9030404@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:35:41 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mif@ietf.org
References: <4F71B21B.3040907@gmail.com> <4F72B929.7030204@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F72B929.7030204@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [mif] Issue: message size for communicating the default route? draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:35:48 -0000

Le 28/03/2012 09:09, Tomek Mrugalski a écrit :
> On 12-03-27 14:27, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
>> Dear participants in MIF WG,
>>
>> Currently draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04 specifies that when
>> communicating a default route, the minimal message size (RT_PREFIX
>> option absent) is 46 bytes (Next Hop Option 20bytes, Route Prefix Option
>> 26bytes).
> Please re-read the draft, section 5.2. Note that prefix field itself is
> variable and its size depends on prefix-length. You seem to be
> interested in low-capability devices. Assuming you use route option to
> configure just default route, Route Prefix option is 10 bytes long, so
> the total is 30, not 46 bytes.

The total could be even smaller (20bytes?) if only one option were used, 
not two (nexthop+routeprefix).

Alex

>
>> Sometimes the draft says this Route Prefix Option may be absent for
>> default routes, thus total length could be 20bytes.
> The ability to skip Route Prefix Option used to be allowed, but that is
> not the case anymore. As I mentioned, there is still text that was
> missed during the last series of updates and it will be removed in -05.
>
> Tomek
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>