Re: [mif] Questions in last 95th MIF meeting

Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi> Thu, 21 April 2016 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE1A12E4D9 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SqUw3iAp2z24 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from johanna1.inet.fi (mta-out1.inet.fi [62.71.2.232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B67212E4B3 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
RazorGate-KAS: Rate: 0
RazorGate-KAS: {MIME-Version: double versions}
RazorGate-KAS: Envelope from:
RazorGate-KAS: Version: 5.5.3
RazorGate-KAS: LuaCore: 80 2014-11-10_18-01-23 260f8afb9361da3c7edfd3a8e3a4ca908191ad29
RazorGate-KAS: Method: none
RazorGate-KAS: Lua profiles 69136 [Nov 12 2014]
RazorGate-KAS: Status: not_detected
Received: from [176.93.187.4] (176.93.187.4) by johanna1.inet.fi (9.0.002.03-2-gbe5d057) (authenticated as stenma-47) id 57123F91006A143E; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:36:09 +0300
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-359AC446-3134-498D-B17B-35DFBE8DCC4E
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Markus Stenberg <markus.stenberg@iki.fi>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (13E238)
In-Reply-To: <COL125-W6FE908A798F23A69D7D8DB16E0@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:36:08 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C8650BBD-91A3-4118-B043-B9B41A97779D@iki.fi>
References: <COL125-W6FE908A798F23A69D7D8DB16E0@phx.gbl>
To: Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/QiA4S8zMyjNUgxYD4A228_JB2kc>
Cc: "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>, Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [mif] Questions in last 95th MIF meeting
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 17:36:15 -0000

Q1/3 not really. 

Q2 I believe there is useful work to be done, but I abstain as I do not plan to work further on pvds for now. 

-Markus

Sent from my preciouss, aka iPad ;)


> On 21.4.2016, at 18.21, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> Hello all
> 
> Chairs would like to ask questions again in the list about rechartering for AD's reference due to lacking of participation.
> 
> Q1: Are you working on PVDs?
> 
> Q2: What do you think that MIF should do at this moment?
> 1) Recharter
> 2) Hiatus
> 3) Close
> 
> Q3: Do you like to work on PvDS?
> 
> Many thanks for your feedback
> 
> Cochairs.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif