[mif] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-00.txt
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 25 April 2012 16:20 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEDB21F8649 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:20:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M8v9FMCChrZ6 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C02921F85E6 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iazz13 with SMTP id z13so317794iaz.31 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kn+WvWxO3ulPTrWv3OgjAhG+30HTzb0GhlNCmFbNb1c=; b=pMZrqjZ1wL8L9hGIYhWMpW8gDtnKxunsnuDhnThroAWTjSGkCAQDYlpAuOqC5NaXRT nG6hNlzUZKd9IQEQGRoO2NEHKQDD2HhQ4pnuN891tH3sjrEiYRupfOIPqQupI5cF0UA8 1U9j4mI91AC9cDYGifRsHL7ms/Kmtq/PTrXUzCTgynHu+7gsxnr27kDFG5HlKv7dU8z2 MLb+0w9gadqKQKbxrUWCA7NCDT6JuNTLrPFnXADTVKogsgXbB2zHQjUGtsRr1phW9h6M jausZc0sRidM3HAlHlVuizsb6iXVOWnMmTGdLABmMdovVFIzH9BOQv9ZXIHbqaI43GFA mpOw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.159.202 with SMTP id xe10mr3285698igb.66.1335370848662; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.194.73 with HTTP; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcdKtsC_H3uTSh_uM77Wg8iJThL_+yOR5M6AvEVamyFehQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120424215837.16501.71842.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC8QAcdKtsC_H3uTSh_uM77Wg8iJThL_+yOR5M6AvEVamyFehQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:20:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfESBz+K-hxrjReXwoS1iaSwV5+8SbLHN-0orKKU+te+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: mif@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [mif] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:20:51 -0000
I have submitted RA version of the route option draft. I know that this issue has been discussed a lot but for the RA version there was no draft. So now, we have a draft. I think that the consensus from IETF 83 was to go for RA options. Regards, Behcet ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:01 PM Subject: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-00.txt To: Wojciech Dec <wdec@cisco.com>, Tomasz Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, suntao@chinamobile.com Hi all, If you wish to be coauthor, please let me know. I'll be happy to make -01 with you. Regards, Behcet ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:58 PM Subject: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-00.txt To: sarikaya@ieee.org A new version of I-D, draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Behcet Sarikaya and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-sarikaya-mif-6man-ra-route Revision: 00 Title: IPv6 RA Options for Multiple Interface Next Hop Routes Creation date: 2012-04-24 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 9 Abstract: This draft defines new Router Advertisement options for configuring next hop routes on the mobile or fixed nodes. Using these options, an operator can easily configure nodes with multiple interfaces (or otherwise multi-homed) to enable them to select the routes to a destination. Each option is defined together with definitions of host and router behaviors. The IETF Secretariat
- [mif] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sar… Behcet Sarikaya