Re: [mif] Questions in last 95th MIF meeting

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 21 April 2016 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF93E12D130 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1rq0TdSLK1UN for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22b.google.com (mail-lf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69F912D105 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id g184so68006373lfb.3 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oRi0pZ2AwsYTfHYfZkoj1qaJqCryljt/C4OrY9KwKGo=; b=UJtTyH8XVs89tYgHmeW3+zUVR38bGuIu1VZv1Ggl+2XryhHFg1skM9/VLMj76sHZ5w gBIgz1Ke7od2HQzxg1dNiNqsO6MQX5jI4XJswvNi6z4zOoiAsHRb6HkIGrWuGbKgSki0 2Pw953TD8Qx4zeo8fWEfwVlHo6T6AAeuBMVqKAifYtZ8YJx+7MmzAcbcAG8aX36bnbYs 03/MxMLNoqIml4b+R4jzYXjRdWXcpt8v89lzA8ZRF85b/zNT7bl7kvf98Kmf0bpNFNrX cDDOIqrvO6cV+UuA9m/tj1z/3pF7SDCYIswX3k9gOeaOe/IrUD5GLD6kwdX5+Si8pn4J P3WA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oRi0pZ2AwsYTfHYfZkoj1qaJqCryljt/C4OrY9KwKGo=; b=EELs2knPQLIq658CJTXhULnW6Anm2/o8pjL19mA88ll4vLD1pFej7btRTmhMAkWZ1v ry+BmbNqxxnQkYjse9RUWLhL+5A+jZV0bHj5hrVODrXhO+yPTYGybJHs80BiqaIWX4z5 CFtOY8qY0vYlM3TaoMfFwHzFJqK3bm1Qa0bbA7i0UO07eWT5cnwtz6YgMJirzlJh3p5W 7uStZNYHxujxtwOWHsWPoGV1c0644zhjz7Y8ItkgaChiRAsurwYrTdVoEJO2xE9s8m2d Ib5JTy1srCrojGqMWQIyJfi/mlSp6qr1+Bd+sSPPkhSDKenb0P/epDPkzuFA5U2DhbSn ID9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV1LGZyfOa/x/DaaQWdEyboMACLUpUWohBSlEgfU9W48xL2SPZXnvuePzb1h6ESnNORRGMpSO6jf0TX8w==
X-Received: by 10.25.41.70 with SMTP id p67mr7303584lfp.124.1461271797982; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.213.19 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 13:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
In-Reply-To: <09518262-497A-42D6-A032-A17A33B211FB@apple.com>
References: <COL125-W6FE908A798F23A69D7D8DB16E0@phx.gbl> <09518262-497A-42D6-A032-A17A33B211FB@apple.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:49:18 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mq-9tvP3aFnCwFAGbFYwHOChVLKbAP_F8pyPgwccKqzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f22c8707bd6053104da69
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mif/XT2pDsbuZPLY2stswgmv7hkFJrI>
Cc: "mif@ietf.org" <mif@ietf.org>, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>, Margaret Cullen <mrcullen42@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [mif] Questions in last 95th MIF meeting
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mif/>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 20:50:01 -0000

It seems clear to me that there is still work to do, particularly to make
MIF possible on a homenet.   I think rechartering to make that happen is
the right move, and intend to work on those documents.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>; wrote:

> Hello,
>
> As discussed at the meeting at IETF 95:
>
> 1) Yes, I am working on PvDs
> 2) I believe MIF should recharter to focus on the remaining work
> (primarily, defining discovery and use of Explicit PvDs; and defining
> requirements for use and interaction with PvDs)
> 3) Yes, I would like to work on ideas and drafts for PvDs around the
> recharter items mentioned above
>
> I think that the work that MIF has done to lay down the definitions of
> PvDs is useful, but there is a bit more work that should be done to make
> sure these concepts can be usefully applied to real-life scenarios that
> require explicit PvD configuration. Leaving that work by the wayside would
> potentially hinder other working groups that have mentioned MIF as a source
> of solutions for this space.
>
> Thanks,
> Tommy
>
> On Apr 21, 2016, at 8:21 AM, Hui Deng <denghui02@hotmail.com>; wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> Chairs would like to ask questions again in the list about rechartering
> for AD's reference due to lacking of participation.
>
> Q1: Are you working on PVDs?
>
> Q2: What do you think that MIF should do at this moment?
> 1) Recharter
> 2) Hiatus
> 3) Close
>
> Q3: Do you like to work on PvDS?
>
> Many thanks for your feedback
>
> Cochairs.
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mif mailing list
> mif@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>
>