[mif] Issue MAC address for IP of default route draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 01 August 2012 20:37 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E2311E82A9 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.356, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 539fvol31ezZ for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B5211E829D for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 13:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so8374722ghb.31 for <mif@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gdTU2WhmTCjkgE3n6+P++MmefKrpDNbfQOclROhcRyo=; b=esxqG8IPwGMfD3CyLoCYAK07e5ubxGdAb7Q/5KCzwvE5Jd1o3LEVJWjNfh8phjACSa rQ0xVeq7aMrpHKQ6NsgCDA6D+8QPqfy9uo78QO2dCpJUGOVyErIRrUqzh2ArlrNj4Dc5 MxX0sqF1Fd+H6AM3TvH/sysya53T/FFIq2RUmeQmnq+ZZKqIbh/RUdX9y9BEdoNr1t1r do+MofixfOOEAMiabI3fzp2wK38lpMJJZNl1NEItB4NvIe8FLggDH6qY66usuK3JqTrY 7/Ovs7WF7XbNJRdssqzOZ2qcj4gc+kbxnmF9Exng1VdRkgQ3FvUztpMZ3QddgcyZq/Rz OTOw==
Received: by 10.66.87.66 with SMTP id v2mr42251274paz.71.1343853477363; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.19.61] (dhcp-133d.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.19.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qx9sm3240371pbc.8.2012.08.01.13.37.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5019939C.6050505@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:37:48 -0700
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mif <mif@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [mif] Issue MAC address for IP of default route draft-ietf-mif-dhcpv6-route-option-04
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 20:37:58 -0000
>> MAC address not configured >> >> Answer: it doesn’t need to be. MAC derived via ND. > > This is not what was said on the email list, and even less at the > mic. On the mailing list, the range of comments were from "no MAC" to > "maybe MAC". To me the latter seemed more agreed. Do you think it is worth adding this issue to the issue tracker? This was discussed publicly March 2012. There were like 3-to-1 suggestions against this. There may have been private discussions as well - I dont know. In this context - do you think it is still useful fo file for an issue on the issue tracker? Alex
- [mif] Issue MAC address for IP of default route d… Alexandru Petrescu