[mif] Generalising PVD IDs
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 07 November 2013 21:58 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FE111E82A4 for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:58:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eOVkeO3bmbmP for <mif@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22d.google.com (mail-bk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DAD11E82A6 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f45.google.com with SMTP id r7so474327bkg.32 for <mif@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:54:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FwaOwxe22vBYiIhRjQajjJC9LFWhuBrslpKpq0NDZJU=; b=eJJ4DGWYJftpyjbL1a+U1f27H7Viyve1Vl8bNt3sTaFxaLCXOQugbSZfXZB0PAfzhn yxW+x4o16K5xC47vqvbudcS/mTW4k3sbOSmnie/1X5lxUZfKTlvTvHBaDiqisLCUZ0zs 4/e76b0Oz5/nSbOcwe8H1flJ/mqt5n9l6HpGNlI0BMjZRpdP6Xbntga7KHibLnJVAsm9 5Wz1mifSbd1dGe+pinoLKTwxuK+4i24biYZ7XRDsmOuvMolg0ik+aAX+o+o19LHFceP7 YvCRFxSbbWnTfKTYLbmCy1wTtSmQaW6dvq/yNyZ73FjtciGgXjl2Z3zwNmVT0ufApjIT 2VwA==
X-Received: by 10.204.105.198 with SMTP id u6mr8028952bko.19.1383861294809; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [31.133.165.38] (dhcp-a526.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.165.38]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm3674036bkg.0.2013.11.07.13.54.52 for <mif@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <527C0C36.1050008@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 10:55:02 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mif@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mif] Generalising PVD IDs
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:58:29 -0000
I suggested that PVD IDs are a subset of a more general need, which is IDs for a reachable address scope. The notion of address scope that I have in mind was discussed in a couple of expired drafts: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-grobj-reqts-00#section-2 A much older draft actually proposed a specific format for a ScopeID, namely an imaginary IPv6 address under a ULA prefix. I don't stand by that, but you can find it in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-behave-referral-object-00#section-4.10. Regards Brian
- [mif] Generalising PVD IDs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [mif] Generalising PVD IDs Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif] Generalising PVD IDs Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [mif] Generalising PVD IDs Ted Lemon