Re: [mif] MIF new charter
<teemu.savolainen@nokia.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 05:29 UTC
Return-Path: <teemu.savolainen@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mif@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1AC3A6405 for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5NKCCxkp8f1u for <mif@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0F83A67B6 for <mif@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh105.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with ESMTP id o9B5Tvoo030875; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:30:07 +0300
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:29:51 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:29:51 +0300
Received: from NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.86]) by nok-am1mhub-04.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.8]) with mapi; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:29:49 +0200
From: teemu.savolainen@nokia.com
To: jari.arkko@piuha.net, mif@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:29:48 +0200
Thread-Topic: [mif] MIF new charter
Thread-Index: ActovNpfKO6TUb/PSyGVeywR0dDF8AARujGg
Message-ID: <18034D4D7FE9AE48BF19AB1B0EF2729F5F03FB79DB@NOK-EUMSG-01.mgdnok.nokia.com>
References: <4CB2272D.2090401@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CB2272D.2090401@piuha.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Oct 2010 05:29:51.0059 (UTC) FILETIME=[53B93230:01CB6905]
X-Nokia-AV: Unscannable
Subject: Re: [mif] MIF new charter
X-BeenThere: mif@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiple Interface Discussion List <mif.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mif>
List-Post: <mailto:mif@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif>, <mailto:mif-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 05:29:04 -0000
Jari, In the dnsop WG there seemed to be some concerns regarding "split-DNS" terminology: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/current/msg08455.html Hence we perhaps should consider if some other term, such as "DNS server selection", would be more appropriate? The goal could then look like: -- 1) *DNS server selection* solution: a specification for describing a way for a network to communicate to nodes information required to perform advanced DNS server selection *in deployments using local namespaces*. The specification shall describe the information to be delivered for nodes and the protocol to be used for delivery. -- And -- Jan 2011 Initial WG draft on advanced DNS server selection solution Nov 2011 Submit advanced DNS server selection solution to IESG for publication as a Proposed Standard RFC -- Best regards, Teemu > -----Original Message----- > From: mif-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mif-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > ext Jari Arkko > Sent: 10. lokakuuta 2010 23:51 > To: mif > Subject: [mif] MIF new charter > > Folks, > > I have looked at the proposed new work items, and I think they make a > lot of sense. But I did want to fine-tune the text a bit. Here is the > suggested new charter and the diff to the current one: > > http://www.arkko.com/ietf/mif/newcharter.txt > http://www.arkko.com/ietf/mif/charterdiff.html > > Comments appreciated. > > Jari > > _______________________________________________ > mif mailing list > mif@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
- [mif] MIF new charter Jari Arkko
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter teemu.savolainen
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Jari Arkko
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Scott Brim
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter teemu.savolainen
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter teemu.savolainen
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter teemu.savolainen
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Ted Lemon
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Jari Arkko
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Scott Brim
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter jouni korhonen
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Jari Arkko
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Wojciech Dec
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter jouni korhonen
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter jouni korhonen
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Jouni
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Jouni
- Re: [mif] MIF new charter Behcet Sarikaya