Re: [mile] IODEF-SCI tools available / MTI schema

["Takeshi Takahashi" <[e-mail]>]

My sentences were not clear, so let me rewrite the below sentence.

> It seems to be a bit difficult to embed the MMDEF itself inside the draft.

It seems to be a bit difficult to copy & paste the MMDEF schema on the
IODEF-SCI draft since the MMDEF is an evolving specification and the
community is still very active.


Kind regards,
Take

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Takeshi Takahashi
> Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 3:31 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [mile] IODEF-SCI tools available / MTI schema
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> We created simple tools that can generate, exchange, and parse (and store
> and locate) IODEF-SCI documents.
> They are Java-based tools and are available online.
> 
> https://github.com/TakeshiTakahashi/IODEF-SCI/wiki/IODEF-SCI-tools
> 
> Regarding the MTI schema, I am sorry for not being able to report anything
> back until now.
> It seems to be a bit difficult to embed the MMDEF itself inside the draft.
> Thus I would like to propose to embed the attached schema.
> The schema is not MMDEF version 1.2, but is generated based on that.
> It should be able to suffice the purpose of MTI, I believe.
> The draft will clearly state that the MTI schema embedded in the draft is
> generated based on the MMDEF version 1.2 (the draft attached already
states
> that).
> 
> Take
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Takeshi Takahashi [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 8:46 AM
> > To: 'Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)'; 'Moriarty, Kathleen'; '[e-mail]'
> > Subject: RE: Request for draft reviews - review of SCI
> >
> > Hi Panos,
> >
> > Thank you very much for reviewing the draft again.
> > I'll check the XML/schema once again.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Take
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 2:29 AM
> > To: Moriarty, Kathleen; [e-mail]; Takeshi Takahashi
> > ([e-mail])
> > Subject: RE: Request for draft reviews - review of SCI
> >
> > Hi Take,
> > I have reviewed this a few times and  it is ready to go, in my mind.
> > All my concerns have been addressed in previous iterations.
> > The only thing I would do is to make sure that the XML in the appendix
> > is syntactically correct.
> > Rgs,
> > Panos
> >
> >
> >
> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
> > Of Moriarty, Kathleen
> > Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:13 PM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: [mile] Request for draft reviews
> >
> > Greetings!
> >
> > We have had a number of documents updated since the last meeting.
> > Thank you to all of the editors for making the requested changes!  The
> > current list of drafts up for review (including those that will be a
> > part of the WG after the charter update) include:
> >
> > RFC5070-bis (IODEF Revision):
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis/
> >
> > Draft on IODEF Guidance:
> > (input from experience, real use cases, and draft review will be
> > helpful)
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance/
> >
> > Structured Cybersecurity Information draft (close to final):
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-sci/
> >
> > IODEF Enumeration Reference Format:
> >
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-montville-mile-enum-reference-fo
> > rmat/
> >
> > Resource-Oriented Lightweight Indicator Exchange (ROLIE):
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-field-mile-rolie/
> >
> > Please take some time to review the drafts and provide feedback to the
> > list.  It would be helpful if we can iterate on most of them prior to
> > the next meeting.  A couple of the drafts are very close to being
> > done.  The list of current drafts and published RFCs can be found at
> > the following
> > link:
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mile/
> >
> > We will follow up soon on the charter update as well.
> >
> > Thank you all in advance!
> > Kathleen
> >
> >