[mile] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rolie-11: (with COMMENT)

[Alissa Cooper <[e-mail]>]

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mile-rolie-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rolie/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The schema registration in Section 8.1 says "See section A of this document." I
think you mean Appendix A? Also, as with Ben I don't understand what it implies
for the schema to be informative.

Section 8.3 says "Designated Expert reviews should be routed through the MILE
WG mailing list.  Failing this, the Designated Expert will be assigned by the
IESG." Might it be better to assign a back-up designated expert at the time of
the document's approval, so that we don't end up in a situation of prolonging a
registration delay by having to find and approve an expert after the WG mailing
list has proved unresponsive?