[mile] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-murillo-mile-cps-00.txt

Martin Murillo <murillo@ieee.org> Fri, 24 January 2014 02:11 UTC

Return-Path: <murillo@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F68F1A01BE for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:11:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HKfS8rGvk6QO for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from m1plsmtpa01-08.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (m1plsmtpa01-08.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.187]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC46A1A017D for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:10:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.8.90.31] ([66.205.162.90]) by m1plsmtpa01-08.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with id HeAt1n0081xKu6y01eAu0L; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:10:55 -0700
X-Sender: martin@murillos.net
Message-ID: <52E1CBB5.6000906@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:11:01 -0500
From: Martin Murillo <murillo@ieee.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mile@ietf.org
References: <20140122155745.18162.21877.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140122155745.18162.21877.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20140122155745.18162.21877.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [mile] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-murillo-mile-cps-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: murillo@ieee.org
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 02:11:01 -0000

Dear all,

Please find below a link to a proposed draft for extending IODEF for the 
reporting of cyber-physical system incidents. These systems are often 
referred as  Operational Technology Systems, Industrial Control Systems, 
Automatic Control  Systems, or simply Control Systems.

Cyber-Physical systems have been around for decades.  However, they are 
now at a higher risk to be  the target of attacks by individual 
highly-skilled attackers, organized groups, nation-states, or simply 
suffer repercussions of mainstream IT cyber-attacks. While over 90% of 
critical control system infrastructure is currently owned by private 
enterprises, these can have direct repercussions on national security of 
world nations.  Indeed, various of these systems are key parts of 
nuclear reactor facilities, transportation systems, electric power 
distribution, oil and natural gas distribution, health care, water and 
waste-water treatment, dam infrastructure, missile and defense systems, 
and others.   The disruption of these control systems could have a 
significant impact on public health, safety, and lead to large economic 
losses.

Among the issues that catalyze this higher risk are:

i) these systems are gradually becoming more interconnected, ii) legacy 
systems do not have proper cybersecurity protection, iii) the existence 
of highly-skilled individuals and motivations, iv) some these systems 
are generally considered critical, v) these are a natural extension of 
IT cyber-attacks, vi) the emergence of the Internet of Things (IOT), and 
vi) these attacks can be carried out remotely and quite inexpensively.

While there might exist national approaches to deal with incidents, 
there's the need of a global international approach that will engulf 
governments, private organizations and other stakeholders. IETF, as a 
leading global Internet standards organization, seeks to satisfy this 
need through open standards that seek to encompass issues that are 
critical for the global community.

Feedback at two levels are welcome:

1. On the existence and inclusion either by utilizing any already 
existing industry formats (XML-   encoded) and/or by utilizing atomic data
2. Contributions on making the extension (and background information) 
more comprehensive, accurate and principally useful for the community

Look forward to feedback and other input!

Martin Murillo

A new version of I-D, draft-murillo-mile-cps-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Martin Murillo and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-murillo-mile-cps
Revision:	00
Title:		IODEF extension for Reporting Cyber-Physical System Incidents
Document date:	2014-01-21
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		24
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-murillo-mile-cps-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-murillo-mile-cps/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-murillo-mile-cps-00


Abstract:
    This draft document will extend the Incident Object Description
    Exchange Format (IODEF) defined in [RFC5070] to support the reporting
    of incidents dealing with attacks to physical infrastructure through
    the utilization of IT means as a vehicle or as a tool.  These systems
    might also be referred as Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), Operational
    Technology Systems, Industrial Control Systems, Automatic Control
    Systems, or simply Control Systems.  These names are used
    interchangeably in this document.  In this context, an incident is
    generally the result of a cybersecurity issue whose main goal is to
    affect the operation of a CPS.  It is considered that any
    unauthorized alteration of the operation is always malign.  This
    extension will provide the capability of embedding structured
    information, such as identifier- and XML-based information.  In its
    current state, this document provides important considerations for
    further work in implementing Cyber-Physical System incident reports,
    either by utilizing any already existing industry formats (XML-
    encoded) and/or by utilizing atomic data.

    In addition, this document should provide appropriate material for
    helping making due considerations in making an appropriate decision
    on how a CPS reporting is done: 1) through a data format extension to
    the Incident Object Description Exchange Format [RFC5070], 2) forming
    part of an already existing IODEF-extension for structured
    cybersecurity information (currently draft
    draft-ietf-mile-sci-11.txt), or others.  While the format and
    contents of the present document fit more the earlier option, these
    can also be incorporated to the later.

                                                                                   


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat