[mile] Enumeration Version in ENUM-reference
Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com> Tue, 30 July 2013 15:43 UTC
Return-Path: <eburger@standardstrack.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A73421E80B7 for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.546, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dVAM7EoRa2yY for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from biz104.inmotionhosting.com (biz104.inmotionhosting.com [74.124.215.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BBB11E821F for <mile@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64e7.meeting.ietf.org ([130.129.100.231]:55559) by biz104.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <eburger@standardstrack.com>) id 1V4C4i-0005oj-6r for mile@ietf.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:43:00 -0700
From: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2ACD6749-CB00-4B32-99EC-EE3A8221EB8C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Message-Id: <93B31C94-6A66-4F46-8B8D-6A47D6CC8367@standardstrack.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:42:58 +0200
To: "<mile@ietf.org> IETF" <mile@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz104.inmotionhosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - standardstrack.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz104.inmotionhosting.com: authenticated_id: eburger+standardstrack.com/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Subject: [mile] Enumeration Version in ENUM-reference
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 15:43:09 -0000
I am not clear on the meaning of "Enumeration Version." The entire specification is: Registry Version: The IANA-registry-specific version to which an enumeration identifier pertains as an integer greater than zero. The Registry Version is intended to be incremented for each new entry, which permits any string representation for the Enumeration Version, but explicitly structures enumeration ID versions for the purpose of the registry. Enumeration Version: The version of the enumeration as a free- form string from the ASCII character set. First of all, it is not clear that this means the Registry Version is the "most significant version thing" and Enumeration Version is the "less significant version thing." Second, the specification, "a freeform string from the ASCII character set" does not say that it is the separator string. Finally, my interpretation of the example, Full Name: Concept X Identifier Abbreviation: CXI Registry Version: 1 Enumeration Version: any Specification URI: http://cxi.example.com/spec_url tells me that I would expect a version in the table that would look something like "2any3any7". I do not think this is the intent.
- [mile] Enumeration Version in ENUM-reference Eric Burger
- Re: [mile] Enumeration Version in ENUM-reference Adam Montville