Re: [mile] early AD-review of draft-ietf-mile-template

[<[e-mail]>]

Hello Brian,

Thank you for making all of the requested changes.  It appears all recommended changes were addressed in this WGLC.  The document is ready for IESG last call.

Thank you,
Kathleen

-----Original Message-----
From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Sean Trner
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:55 AM
To: Brian Trammell
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [mile] early AD-review of draft-ietf-mile-template

Absolutely.

Spt

Sent from my iPhone

On May 9, 2012, at 11:47 AM, Brian Trammell <[e-mail]> wrote:

> 
> On May 9, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Sean Turner wrote:
> 
>>>> 12) A.8 and A.9 and I guess all appendices in this draft, should we require that they explicitly be marked as normative parts of the document?
>>> 
>>> A.8 and A.9 are weird, in that they're appendices within an appendix. Examples are definitely informative. The XML schema should be normative; however, technically, I would presume it's the schema that goes into the IANA registry (which, of course, in the normal case, gets taken from the schema in Appendix A of an extension document) which is normative.
>> 
>> So I guess adding a sentence in A.8/A.9 to say something like "When the draft is produced this Appendix should be marked as normative" and "When the draft is produced this Appendix should be marked as informative" would work for me.
> 
> Okay, that makes sense. (As I've already submitted an -04, would it be okay to hold this for -05 pending other IESG commentary, presuming there's nothing else that needs to be done before then?)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Brian (author hat)
>