Re: [mile] Request for draft reviews - review of SCI
"Takeshi Takahashi" <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp> Thu, 06 June 2013 23:45 UTC
Return-Path: <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A618C21F944C for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:45:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.355
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.355 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKaFXGcL-imb for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.nict.go.jp (ns1.nict.go.jp [IPv6:2001:df0:232:300::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C2B21F93D4 for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (gw1 [133.243.18.250]) by ns1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id r56NjZil020113; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:45:35 +0900 (JST)
Received: from gw1.nict.go.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id r56NjZ2T014693; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:45:35 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail1.nict.go.jp (mail.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.3]) by gw1.nict.go.jp with ESMTP id r56NjZdf014690; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:45:35 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail1.nict.go.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id ECB4D16958; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:45:34 +0900 (JST)
Received: from VAIO (unknown [133.243.119.109]) by mail1.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail) with ESMTP id E6C8016956; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:45:34 +0900 (JST)
From: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
To: "'Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)'" <pkampana@cisco.com>, "'Moriarty, Kathleen'" <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>, mile@ietf.org
References: <1C9F17D1873AFA47A969C4DD98F98A753C89FE@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1C9F17D1873AFA47A969C4DD98F98A753C89FE@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 08:45:35 +0900
Message-ID: <003301ce630f$f0c33fb0$d249bf10$@nict.go.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHz3n4J3rHmxLifLlgha/2ehXPWR5jeYc8g
Content-Language: ja
Subject: Re: [mile] Request for draft reviews - review of SCI
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:45:50 -0000
Hi Panos, Thank you very much for reviewing the draft again. I'll check the XML/schema once again. Best regards, Take From: Panos Kampanakis (pkampana) [mailto:pkampana@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 2:29 AM To: Moriarty, Kathleen; mile@ietf.org; Takeshi Takahashi (takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp) Subject: RE: Request for draft reviews - review of SCI Hi Take, I have reviewed this a few times and it is ready to go, in my mind. All my concerns have been addressed in previous iterations. The only thing I would do is to make sure that the XML in the appendix is syntactically correct. Rgs, Panos From: mile-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Moriarty, Kathleen Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 2:13 PM To: mile@ietf.org Subject: [mile] Request for draft reviews Greetings! We have had a number of documents updated since the last meeting. Thank you to all of the editors for making the requested changes! The current list of drafts up for review (including those that will be a part of the WG after the charter update) include: RFC5070-bis (IODEF Revision): http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis/ Draft on IODEF Guidance: (input from experience, real use cases, and draft review will be helpful) http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance/ Structured Cybersecurity Information draft (close to final): http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-sci/ IODEF Enumeration Reference Format: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-montville-mile-enum-reference-format/ Resource-Oriented Lightweight Indicator Exchange (ROLIE): http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-field-mile-rolie/ Please take some time to review the drafts and provide feedback to the list. It would be helpful if we can iterate on most of them prior to the next meeting. A couple of the drafts are very close to being done. The list of current drafts and published RFCs can be found at the following link: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mile/ We will follow up soon on the charter update as well. Thank you all in advance! Kathleen
- Re: [mile] Request for draft reviews - review of … Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)
- Re: [mile] Request for draft reviews - review of … Takeshi Takahashi