[mile] [Errata Verified] RFC7970 (5543)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 05 November 2018 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26C9128DFD; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:06:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FYmUXT8w_Q5P; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78AF01274D0; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 24C01B80EBE; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:06:25 -0800 (PST)
To: takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp, rdd@cert.org
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, iesg@ietf.org, mile@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20181105100625.24C01B80EBE@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 02:06:25 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/X7PiE8d0udsG_aCiib_ZIOw5zwE>
Subject: [mile] [Errata Verified] RFC7970 (5543)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 10:06:40 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC7970,
"The Incident Object Description Exchange Format Version 2". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5543

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Technical

Reported by: Takeshi Takahashi <takeshi_takahashi@nict.go.jp>
Date Reported: 2018-11-04
Verified by: Alexey Melnikov (IESG)

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
    <xs:element name="Confidence">
      <xs:complexType>
        <xs:attribute name="rating"
                      type="confidence-rating-type" use="required"/>
        <xs:attribute name="ext-rating"
                      type="xs:string" use="optional"/>
      </xs:complexType>
    </xs:element>

Corrected Text
--------------
    <xs:element name="Confidence">
      <xs:complexType>
        <xs:simpleContent>
          <xs:extension base="xs:float">
            <xs:attribute name="rating"
                          type="confidence-rating-type" use="required"/>
            <xs:attribute name="ext-rating"
                          type="xs:string" use="optional"/>
          </xs:extension>
        </xs:simpleContent>
      </xs:complexType>
    </xs:element>

Notes
-----
Section 3.12.5 says as follows:
  "The content of the class is of type REAL and specifies a numerical
   assessment in the confidence of the data when the value of the rating
   attribute is "numeric".  Otherwise, this element MUST be empty."

The current schema does not allow the confidence class to have the content (REAL type), thus the correction (note the addition of "<xs:extension base="xs:float">") is proposed.

--------------------------------------
RFC7970 (draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-26)
--------------------------------------
Title               : The Incident Object Description Exchange Format Version 2
Publication Date    : November 2016
Author(s)           : R. Danyliw
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG