IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mile] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10: (with COMMENT)

"Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com> Thu, 31 August 2017 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <pkampana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E796E120720; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 08:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32Fc1AUenDYt; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 08:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F44C13236D; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 08:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2614; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1504193200; x=1505402800; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=sPlEkFfIJE4hLS+eia1s9kPXusSlEZpl6RyhLFN9j7U=; b=PO2M37qoQ7doZ2+wy2QvoDwis0+0sA3II/dUp+7600cM8Pk9arQ7UdyP y3m5RgiDMHTnp2EFo8BMaW/NIrgNPd19XX0K8luIuQJhuYX9jcfnLMRcz 6uDz+I08xMeFlppr6Abj70YlciGND0IwEm6bMra9Inif3HRntKtx1F9YR 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CYAAAhKqhZ/5tdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1pkgRUHjhCQHoFxlicOggQhC4UbAoQOPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUYAQEBAQMBATg0CwwEAgEIEQQBAR8JBycLFAkIAgQBDQUIiikQsCKLSQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgyqCAoFOgWODKIRCARIBUYVCBYoDlmwCh1mMbYIchWeKdJZEAR84gQILdxVJhRgcGYFOdgGIGYEjgQ8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,453,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="477469734"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 31 Aug 2017 15:26:39 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (xch-rcd-007.cisco.com [173.37.102.17]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7VFQd9O011808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:26:39 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com (173.36.7.20) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:26:38 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) by XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com ([173.36.7.20]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Thu, 31 Aug 2017 10:26:38 -0500
From: "Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)" <pkampana@cisco.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance@ietf.org>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>, "bill.wu@huawei.com" <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "mile-chairs@ietf.org" <mile-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mile] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTIcYokcSYtfoER0auv1DF8JdkS6Kehi8A
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:26:38 +0000
Message-ID: <03db4ab6dec24c628da6264d985fcbaa@XCH-ALN-010.cisco.com>
References: <150412129792.21599.7418826747975474337.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150412129792.21599.7418826747975474337.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.108.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/Y_InIHsDoFkVT0Lbce65FR1f8gU>
Subject: Re: [mile] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mile/>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2017 15:26:43 -0000

Thank you for the review Warren. We rephrased the sentence about interop to " Interoperability between RID agents implementing [RFC6545"] [RFC6546] was also confirmed. " so that it makes more sense. All the rest of the nits and nit checker finds are also fixed. Also added a minimal IANA considerations section, since practically there are none. 

We still owe responses and fixes for Ben's comments. Will do that soon. 

Panos


-----Original Message-----
From: mile [mailto:mile-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:28 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance@ietf.org; mile@ietf.org; bill.wu@huawei.com; mile-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [mile] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-iodef-guidance/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll also echo Ben / Benoit's comments and also thank Qin Wu for the OpsDir review. I've just seen that you have responded to it, thank you.

I especially don't understand the:
"Interoperability between RID agents and the standards, Use of  [RFC6545] and [RFC6546], were also proven in this exercise." -- is the "Use of" superfluous?
I *think* so, and removing it fixes it, but I'm not quite sure what was intended.

Many of the nit checker things seem simply to solve (like the use of non-documentation addresses) - these should be addressed.

In addition I have some nits:
Section3.1.
"Minimal IODEF document IODEF includes one mandatory classes. "
s/classes/class/

Section 3.2.  Information represented
" The implementer should  carefully look into the schema and decide classes to implement (or not)." -- I think this is missing a "which" between "decide" and "classes".


_______________________________________________
mile mailing list
mile@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email