[mile] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: (with COMMENT)

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis-22: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mile-rfc5070-bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I concur with Alissa's and Alexey's discuss points.

Additionally, I think the rest of the points in Robert Spark's secdir
review[1] deserve responses.

The shepherd writeup mentions a desire for more XML review. Did that
occur? (I note that it also says the XML had been mechanically
verified.)

[1]
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mile/0Io60Sdn--hRzQWN3Q0keCYIA1w