[mile] Implementations
"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 21 March 2013 20:14 UTC
Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mile@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574CB21F899E for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.312
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.288, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EC9G14mLCKep for <mile@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB58721F896C for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm14so7046703wib.3 for <mile@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=RryqNgzGHXhY/wFds9vI0UZze5nXev7pV/GF/e28CBE=; b=1JB/zFsdhrgTeMjXcqtwaLQKa9Fv7bfN+4FfEyemvEJsP6e81KFsCJaIFC/iqjEd3p GiF41FS79wsufNe+TUNmGG5JFKqUJVVtBYky2UjJ4XNjv4Ufa/DX/RdOrP5mTDe/7amP zd1Svwj3cRLxSOIkr3NOSAVpVwbrof/oGVBmnP85tOz1jdJ96LfdD+79IKmrDPORR0S8 mvzLIEUVupM1Vu93GMz+PlN6YB6UmuVng+Fma6W0WGpEsS1r8F9Tgve4oM7tKYQwESEB x8oR4iDBKNwGExVRSVnnFBh5pK4bInhddwZRKLzto7RZJIWJNRHAWpY2JNWDQkkXqbbF ugxQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.44 with SMTP id ez12mr7038364wic.33.1363896864446; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.13.71 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:14:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbAQnEnB_xwBecUJM_6pxSCKdBhYV0=+4Xk3Uxw=NuKfQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c225741d9de204d874fc5c"
Subject: [mile] Implementations
X-BeenThere: mile@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Managed Incident Lightweight Exchange, IODEF extensions and RID exchanges" <mile.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mile>
List-Post: <mailto:mile@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mile>, <mailto:mile-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:14:32 -0000
Hi all, I'm curious to gauge the deployment of IODEF to date. The mobile incident reporting work I mentioned in Orlando is considering several protocol options on which to base its work. Is there a list someplace of organizations, software packages, vendors, etc. that use IODEF, and perhaps some measure of the scale in which they're using it? Thanks, -MSK
- [mile] Implementations Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [mile] Implementations Moriarty, Kathleen